Search results

we have a winning solution

thats basically your call :) try it both ways and see if that alters the results. Or you may favour one result over another so go with that one ;-)

Otherwise you are going to need to come up with some sort of "weighting" application - and that's open to a huge conjecture as to how that could work?

have a minimum number of games for "qualification" ? Your dilemma is the standard cricket averages one whereby one player plays one game and scores 120 and takes 8 wickets, with 6 catches. and ends up top of all the club's tables for the season. Whereas somebody else played 20 matches ...

my guess is there is no correlation at all between the video people and the ref.

scrum half backs off the scrum a bit away from it... and number eight picks up, moves forward, draws the oppo flank and passes to the 9. You see it all the time?

The video clocks aren't showing real game time, that's the issue. Check this out - the video clock is red - and the ref tells Georgia there is still seven minutes to go!

that's fair enough from the coal face Phil!

QED, there is a "blazer"

i dunno. I'm asking you guys - is it acceptable for a referee to coach players? especially at the highest levels (as opposed to Old Twatbaggians' U13 2nd team) After all...

Yes. But I was commenting on #38 - the situation in Australia.

That's still not what the ref allegedly said. There is a difference between "You have a minute left to kick" and "If you wait a minute before kicking, the game is over" Surely?

so - to clarify - the ball carrier can instigate head contact with force with impunity, and any tackler being struck in this manner might get away without a card but still "concede" a PK?

que?

well, a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. AIUI everybody has a blazer that for home games meets and greets the officials and interfaces with them?

hmmm.. so saying "if you wait a minute its time up" is a verbal shot clock? It may be of course - Im trying to ascertain that.

England v Wales U18 6N... England have just scored a try right at the death (70 minute games I presume?) to be one point behind Wales. They have the conversion to go in fornt. Listen to the commentary and the remarks coming up very soon... (video time 1:40:50) Interesting advice from the...

I am not a ref. I do not sit on panels. I have not seen the video I'm struggling to balance clauses 18, 26, 32and 33. In the light of their contents I can see why the rugby citation ended up as "no foul play" and the court ended up with "foul play" [ in effect ]. I'm just struggling to see...

" In the course of his cross examination, it was suggested to Mr Cuthbertson that he should not have accepted instructions to act as an expert because of his previous and ongoing connection with the RFU. It was said that his approach was partisan, involving a selective critique of the evidence...

thanks for the confirmation :-)