Wow...doesn't nutrition make everyone a bit testis (yes - I meant that spelling)
Looks like you all eat too much gluten!
I'll caveat my next comments with the fact that I'm a Paleo fan...well sort of, mines a revised version that works for me. I'd like to go the whole hog but it's almost impossible when you have a wife and kids who think it's a quack and your pantry is full of processed crap.
What I did find ironic on that article after debunking all the lies was this comment: "Be wary of nutritional advice from mainstream "experts" as it may not be based on science—or based on bad information that is several decades outdated. Truthful, accurate information is your number one weapon in taking control of your health."
So why should anyone believe this Dr, and who died and made him God on nutrition?
Just like every single other nutritional article ever written is by a Dr that has a multitude of letters after their name to somehow show how important and expert their advice. The truth is..who the f@ck knows who is or is not telling the truth. IMO it's a friggen nightmare figuring out what is right and what is wrong when you're bombarded with conflicting ideas. It really comes down to what your previous ideas are, your own reading, knowledge, and who was the most convincing.
For me the basic concept of Paleo, which is suggested in the article, makes most sense. (It wasn't the conspiracy theory that US government created the nutrition pyramid only to save its $billions wheat/grain farming industry!)
For me the article was interesting and had some interesting concepts. But I regularly abide by the notion of "half of what you read is bull, and the other half is sh!t". Take out of it what you want and what strikes a cord with other things you've read/believe.
Now excuse me while I shove a hose up my @ss for my daily coffee intake!
epper:
epper:
