Compulsory TMO review for RC

D

Decorily

Coach/Referee
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
1,675
Post Likes
472
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
Presumably, as with everything else, the Referee will be the final arbiter.
Referee must consult but not necessarily agree with the TMO.
 
D

Decorily

Coach/Referee
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
1,675
Post Likes
472
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
I presume it's to try and avoid a scenario where a ref makes a call which can impact hugely on a game and then goes home and sees a discussion (with video ) on Rugbyrefs forum which proves s/he made a Rollix of it!


EDIT Perfectly sensible approach really.
Have all available information before making the decision.
 
Last edited:
beckett50

beckett50


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 31, 2004
Messages
2,514
Post Likes
224
Current Referee grade:
Level 6
I don't recall a situation where a RC for a dangerous/high tackle hasn't been reviewed with the TMO. Very often it will be the TMO who brings the foul play to the attention of the referee.

If one looks at the video clips that WR issued alongside the High Tackle Guidelines there is a double tackle by 2 All black players on (IIRC) Allun Wynn Jones that - under the new Guidelines - merits a red card for both tacklers.

The cynic in me is guessing that this TMO review process is to buy time, defuse the situation and look to find 'mitigating circumstances' so that the losing coach and world media cannot throw accusations at the match officials who would have "...ruined the game with that (those) Red Card..."
 
C

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,826
Post Likes
3,166
beckett50 said:
The cynic in me is guessing that this TMO review process is to buy time, defuse the situation and look to find 'mitigating circumstances' so that the losing coach and world media cannot throw accusations at the match officials who would have "...ruined the game with that (those) Red Card..."
Click to expand...

Yes, I think that's along the right lines - but particularly I suspect that WR would like everyone to focus on the flowchart, and the process, and not on the judgement of the individual referee, and this will be very helpful in that.

(we have recently seen twitter storms against the ref, when in reality he was simply following the flowchart)
 
thepercy

thepercy


Referees in America
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Messages
923
Post Likes
147
Current Referee grade:
Level 1
RCs are serious, taking your time to get it right makes sense, and as above, this time with the teams seperated can have the added benefit that everyone calms down a bit, and its less likely to get punchy.
 
didds

didds

Resident Club Coach
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,202
Post Likes
1,885
thepercy said:
RCs are serious, taking your time to get it right makes sense, and as above, this time with the teams seperated can have the added benefit that everyone calms down a bit, and its less likely to get punchy.
Click to expand...

do the levels which actually have TMOs "get punchy" really?

As opposed to level 9 - with no TMO?



didds
 
beckett50

beckett50


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 31, 2004
Messages
2,514
Post Likes
224
Current Referee grade:
Level 6
didds said:
do the levels which actually have TMOs "get punchy" really?

As opposed to level 9 - with no TMO?

didds
Click to expand...

Maybe in certain Gallic countries :france: :biggrin:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top