Dear America....

Status
Not open for further replies.

Phil E


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
15,492
Post Likes
1,789
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
What the f**k have you done! :shrug:
 

Not Kurt Weaver


Referees in America
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
2,269
Post Likes
153
We kept GITMO open and shut down the Clinton Global Initiative. That is 2 positives thus far. The Clinton Foundation is next.
 

didds

Resident Club Coach
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
10,809
Post Likes
1,220
they have done what the electorate of the UK managed in June.

didds
 

Not Kurt Weaver


Referees in America
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
2,269
Post Likes
153
Overall Trump won approximately 2,600 counties to Clinton’s 500, or about 84% of the geographic United States. However, Clinton won 88 of of the 100 largest counties (including Washington D.C.). Without these 100 largest counties she would have lost by 11.5 million votes.

We explained the electoral college.
 

didds

Resident Club Coach
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
10,809
Post Likes
1,220
Will you PLEASE take Farage?

You can have Johnson as well on a BOGOF offer, no problems.

didds
 

beckett50


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 31, 2004
Messages
2,513
Post Likes
223
Current Referee grade:
Level 6
Will you PLEASE take Farage?

You can have Johnson as well on a BOGOF offer, no problems.

didds

I'll see your Johnson and raise it a Corbyn :biggrin:
 

didds

Resident Club Coach
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
10,809
Post Likes
1,220
Nahh. Corbyn is an internal issue.

Farage and Johnson are international idiots

didds
 

DocY


Referees in England
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Messages
1,809
Post Likes
421
Overall Trump won approximately 2,600 counties to Clinton’s 500, or about 84% of the geographic United States. However, Clinton won 88 of of the 100 largest counties (including Washington D.C.). Without these 100 largest counties she would have lost by 11.5 million votes.

We explained the electoral college.

And without Florida, Texas, Florida, Georgia and Michigan Trump would have lost.

If you start arbitrarily discarding sections of the electorate you can make the result say whatever you want.
 

beckett50


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 31, 2004
Messages
2,513
Post Likes
223
Current Referee grade:
Level 6
And without Florida, Texas, Florida, Georgia and Michigan Trump would have lost.

If you start arbitrarily discarding sections of the electorate you can make the result say whatever you want.

This, in a nutshell, is what an electoral college is all about.
 

Not Kurt Weaver


Referees in America
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
2,269
Post Likes
153
And without Florida, Texas, Florida, Georgia and Michigan Trump would have lost.

If you start arbitrarily discarding sections of the electorate you can make the result say whatever you want.

1. You counted FLA twice

2. We only need to discard 3 states for Hilary win not four. Just FLA, TX, and (GA or MICH) would suffice

3. Thank you for your interest in electoral college, and explaining that populous counties do not decide elections. Populous states do.
 

Taff


Referees in Wales
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
6,939
Post Likes
378
I'll see your Johnson ...
No pics please Dickie E. :biggrin:

This, in a nutshell, is what an electoral college is all about.
Am I being thick? In a 2 horse race, why do the Americans need the complication of an Electoral College? :chin:

Why not just have a national election - no need to count states or counties - just add up all the votes and the one with most votes wins.
 

Balones

Referee Advisor / Assessor
Joined
Oct 24, 2006
Messages
1,196
Post Likes
322
No pics please Dickie E. :biggrin:


Am I being thick? In a 2 horse race, why do the Americans need the complication of an Electoral College? :chin:

Why not just have a national election - no need to count states or counties - just add up all the votes and the one with most votes wins.

Sounds like a referendum!:biggrin:
 

Not Kurt Weaver


Referees in America
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
2,269
Post Likes
153
Am I being thick? In a 2 horse race, why do the Americans need the complication of an Electoral College? :chin:

Why not just have a national election - no need to count states or counties - just add up all the votes and the one with most votes wins.

I believe it is designed to keep the common man down. My net worth was invested in a sure fire company that made easter egg colored, pear shaped pants suits designed for post menopausal women/or men (to be political correct).

I'm currently worth $ 439, because today was payday. I lost everything cause of this damned electoral college thing from that constitution thing a ma bob.
 

OB..


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
22,952
Post Likes
1,816
In a 2 horse race, why do the Americans need the complication of an Electoral College? :chin:
The system was devised back in the 18th century when communication across the USA was extremely slow. With a written constitution such things are hard to change, and the winning side has no incentive to do so.

The Constitution was heavily influenced by Montesquieu et al whose ideas on the Separation of Powers are built in. You elect a President (Executive) separately from Congress(Legislative) and have a nominally unrelated Justice system.

The system means you can elect a President with no political (or military) background. Whether that is good or not remains to be seen.

There is no perfect electoral system since the criteria tend to conflict. Clinton got 48.2% of the popular vote against Trump's 46.1% - and our system of constituencies can produce the same effect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top