- Joined
- Jul 12, 2005
- Messages
- 13,680
- Post Likes
- 1,760
- Current Referee grade:
- Level 2
I agree there is nothing wrong with using the kind of language to make a point. In these two examples it wasn't that ad hominem.
However in these recent posts below, you will find that ad hominem thingy
These are not ad hominim IMO - YMMV
From a free speech standpoint his has actually turned out to be more productive to inclusion in rugby and that wasn't his intent.
1. He was fired
2. He coach was threatened (because of his inciting other, according to you)
3. Wigan announced pride day 20 minutes after his signing
4. a misleading response was reported at dragons game concerning confiscated flags
5. Dragons, his team, announce a pride day
IF put it out for everyone to talk about and solve it, and he was to stuck in "silly form of delusion" to know it.
Yeah, I don't buy into that kind of sick spin. I find it disgusting.
Its like saying "well thanks to the Christchurch Mosque shooter killing all those people, New Zealanders have had to address the issue of assault rifles, and banned them, and that can only be a good thing, amirite!?"
In my book, Folau gets ZERO credit for any of the good stuff that may have happened in the wake of his rantings.
And lastly, I do not know any devout homosexual Christians. But if I did, I'm pretty sure they have come to an understanding of this passage presented by IF. The "devout" thing is kind of a give away. and I'm pretty sure they would explain it to others. Kinda goes with being devout. and I'm pretty sure they know IF is incorrect. and I'm pretty sure they even pray for IF
See my previous post.