Fumbled over his own dead ball line?

CrouchTPEngage


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
498
Post Likes
58
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
A gentle introduction to the season as i reffed a game this weekend where some players questioned my decision on the following.
attacking team kicked the ball into the in goal area. the defending full back had to turn round and he ran back and (facing back towards his own dead ball line ) he made a pigs ear of trying to pick up the ball. he ended up knocking the ball twice backwards so that it rolled over the dead ball line.
Now, i must have hesitated for a second as he turned to me and said 'i touched that down Sir.'
The attackers claimed quoting about 'But you cant knock the ball dead ,Sir'

i decided that it had been kicked into the in goal by the attackers so a 22 d o was the correct restart.
I have no idea what the full back was trying to do but he did not ground the ball. i am sure his knocking the ball dead was not intentional.

having since read law 22.11, i am not sure if this specific situation is covered by the laws,
it provoked a bit of post match discussion anyway.

Who was right ?
5 m attacking scrum or 22 d o ?
 
Last edited:

damo


Referees in New Zealand
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
1,692
Post Likes
276
A gentle introduction to the season as i reffed a game this weekend where some players questioned my decision on the following.
attacking team kicked the ball into the in goal area. the defending full back had to turn round and he ran back and (facing back towards his own dead ball line ) he made a pigs ear of trying to pick up the ball. he ended up knocking the ball twice backwards so that it rolled over the dead ball line.
Now, i must have hesitated for a second as he turned to me and said 'i touched that down Sir.'
The attackers claimed quoting about 'But you cant knock the ball dead ,Sir'

i decided that it had been kicked into the in goal by the attackers so a 22 d o was the correct restart.
I have no idea what the full back was trying to do but he did not ground the ball. i am sure his knocking the ball dead was not intentional.

having since read law 22.11, i am not sure if this specific situation is covered by the laws,
it provoked a bit of post match discussion anyway.

Who was right ?
5 m attacking scrum or 22 d o ?
The bolded bit is the key. If the attacking team put it there and it goes dead then it is a DO 22m. The other key is that he knocked it back unintentionally. Had it been intentional then it would be a PK to attackers 5m out in line with where he hit it dead.

You were right.
 

Phil E


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
16,103
Post Likes
2,364
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
As above. 22do.
 

ChrisR

Player or Coach
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
3,231
Post Likes
356
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
ditto to #2
 

Browner

Banned
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
6,000
Post Likes
270
Well done on your logic, and correctness of decision in the heat of battle.

I'd expect most attackers to claim the same, irrespective of whether it was deliberate or not.
 

Adam


Referees in England
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
2,489
Post Likes
35
If his handling was crap as suggested then 22do is correct call.

If he intentionally did it then PK+/-YC or PT+YC depending on game situation.
 

SimonSmith


Referees in Australia
Staff member
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
9,369
Post Likes
1,471
If his handling was crap as suggested then 22do is correct call.

If he intentionally did it then PK+/-YC or PT+YC depending on game situation.

Just for giggles:
Law reference?
 

The Fat


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
4,204
Post Likes
496
Just for giggles:
Law reference?

10.2 Unfair play


(a) Intentionally Offending. A player must not intentionally infringe any Law of the Game, or play unfairly. The player who intentionally offends must be either admonished, or cautioned that a send off will result if the offence or a similar offence is committed, or sent off.

Sanction: Penalty kick

A penalty try must be awarded if the offence prevents a try that would probably otherwise have been scored. A player who prevents a try being scored through foul play must either be cautioned and temporarily suspended or sent off.


(b) Time-wasting. A player must not intentionally waste time.

Sanction: Free Kick


(c) Throwing into touch. A player must not intentionally knock, place, push or throw the ball with his arm or hand into touch, touch-in-goal, or over the dead ball line.

Sanction: Penalty kick on the 15-metre line if the offence is between the 15-metre line and the touchline, or, at the place of infringement if the offence occured elsewhere in the field of play, or, 5 metres from the goal line and at least 15 metres from the touchline if the infringement occured in in-goal.

A penalty try must be awarded if the offence prevents a try that would probably otherwise have been scored.
 

SimonSmith


Referees in Australia
Staff member
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
9,369
Post Likes
1,471
Ah. That's the fella. Couldn't find 10.2.c

Thanks
 
Top