Couldn't find a discussion on this one, but point let me know if already being discussed.
In one of the games at on Saturday (forget which, but think it was France v Scotland), there is a long kick that goes out on the full by Team 1. Team 2 take a QTI behind the 22m (rather than accept the lineout that would have been in the other half of the field - probably around the 10m line?).
After the WTI, the Team 2 kick from behind 22m goes directly into touch around the halfway.
The lineout got awarded to Team 1 around the halfway.
I thought this was wrong. The initial lineout should have been outside the 22m, so the QTI took the ball into the 22m, so the lineout should have been inline with the Team 2 kicker.
Tactically - don't understand why Team 2 took the QTI - they lost out as a result of it even with the wrong (in my view) decision of where the final lineout should be. (lost territory and possession)
Anyone else remember this?
In one of the games at on Saturday (forget which, but think it was France v Scotland), there is a long kick that goes out on the full by Team 1. Team 2 take a QTI behind the 22m (rather than accept the lineout that would have been in the other half of the field - probably around the 10m line?).
After the WTI, the Team 2 kick from behind 22m goes directly into touch around the halfway.
The lineout got awarded to Team 1 around the halfway.
I thought this was wrong. The initial lineout should have been outside the 22m, so the QTI took the ball into the 22m, so the lineout should have been inline with the Team 2 kicker.
Tactically - don't understand why Team 2 took the QTI - they lost out as a result of it even with the wrong (in my view) decision of where the final lineout should be. (lost territory and possession)
Anyone else remember this?