Man off protocol

Ciaran Trainor

Ciaran Trainor


Referees in England
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Messages
2,848
Post Likes
362
Location
Walney Island
Current Referee grade:
Level 7
Just to throw another variation in.
The designated Front row replacement might be one or more of the starting 15 not on the bench. (usually in the pack)
I had a L8 game a few years ago where the both teams nominated FR replacements were the Stand offs!
I knew both teams well and could verify both could play in the FR.
 
M

Marc Wakeham


Referees in Wales
Joined
Jan 5, 2018
Messages
2,779
Post Likes
842
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
No I'm happy that I'm right and I've seen it applied as such.

15, 16 AND 17 are about uncontested scrums cause by a FR player going off (with 16 specifically stating when the enquiry is made as the contested scrums or not!). 18 is about front row replacement generally.
 
C

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,810
Post Likes
3,148
Ciaran Trainor said:
Just to throw another variation in.
The designated Front row replacement might be one or more of the starting 15 not on the bench. (usually in the pack)
I had a L8 game a few years ago where the both teams nominated FR replacements were the Stand offs!
I knew both teams well and could verify both could play in the FR.
Click to expand...
Could they play at 10 ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top