Mark. Clean catch

CrouchTPEngage


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
497
Post Likes
57
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
Just reading law 17 and I can't find the words 'clean catch' anywhere in the text have we changed the laws or was there no longer a requirement for the catch to be clean. For example a player who attempts to catch it but ends up knocking it forward then catching it on the second attempt is not a clean catch therefore we can or cannot order Mark?
Ta.
 

chbg


Referees in England
Joined
May 15, 2009
Messages
1,479
Solutions
1
Post Likes
439
Current Referee grade:
Level 7
"directly catching an opponent’s kick" (Definitions) and "directly from an opponent’s kick" (Law 17) for me means a 'clean catch'. Do you have a TV example otherwise?
 

Dickie E


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
14,106
Post Likes
2,131
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
"directly catching an opponent’s kick" (Definitions) and "directly from an opponent’s kick" (Law 17) for me means a 'clean catch'.
that's not really in line with the definition:

Directly caught:
A ball caught without first touching anyone else or the ground
 

chbg


Referees in England
Joined
May 15, 2009
Messages
1,479
Solutions
1
Post Likes
439
Current Referee grade:
Level 7
I have to agree with you, but the 'simplified' Laws then say it twice in 17.1b.
 

Zebra1922


Referees in Scotland
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
716
Post Likes
233
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
If it no longer says clean catch in the laws I’m allowing a juggle.
 

CrouchTPEngage


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
497
Post Likes
57
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
I remembered seeing a mark being disallowed in Premiership last few months and referee explaining to player (who had thought his catching it was enough ) that it has to be a 'clean catch '.
But just checking if, and where in laws I can point to , to backup this interpretation.
Seems vague to me now.
 

CrouchTPEngage


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
497
Post Likes
57
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
Given the laws as written, I'll now allow a juggle +catch and feel confident to support my decision in the bar after the game.
 

Volun-selected


Referees in America
Joined
Jun 11, 2018
Messages
548
Post Likes
301
Location
United States
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
I’m with the jugglers on this one. The definition of “Directly caught” is
A ball caught without first touching anyone else or the ground.
No mention of not bouncing around in the air, so as long as they get it under control before they yell “mark” I’m good. If it’s up in the air or bouncing hand to hand, you are still fair game - not caught in my book.
 

Dickie E


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
14,106
Post Likes
2,131
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Does the player have to make the free kick arm signal too? It seems to be de rigueur these days :)
 

didds

Resident Club Coach
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,032
Post Likes
1,775
I cant see it was ever a requirement ? Suspect its done as a visual clue to the ref who may not hear a call in a noisy/windy stadium/pitch. And because its done at the top levels there WILL be SOME refs out there who now THINK its necessary in order to award a mark, so grassroots players do it "just in case". (Of course those players may also THINK its needed too!)
 

Lee Lifeson-Peart


Referees in England
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Messages
7,798
Post Likes
999
Current Referee grade:
Level 6
IME
I would say most markers call "Mark" and do the bent arm.
Some just the bent arm only.
Fewer shout "mark" only.
No one shouts mark and slams their heel into the turf and then collapses clutching their shattered posterior cruciate ligament. :rolleyes:
 

Mipper


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 15, 2021
Messages
192
Post Likes
83
Current Referee grade:
Level 10
I think the arm signal from the player crept in due to the ability (or lack thereof) of the ref to hear the call.

Either due to the crowd noise, or rather at my level, the long distance between the ref and the catcher!
 
Top