A little unhelpful to draw parallels between the LoTG and language learning mnemonics.
There are no hard and fast rules to English grammar, but rather useful guidelines we traditionally teach students to help them decide for themselves what they’d like to say and how they’d like to say it. The Laws of Rugby Union are not entirely like that. By which, I mean if we left it up to the players which Laws they would like to apply to the game it’d be absolute anarchy.
Grammar police, MUST read this article before replying.
When I tried to suggest that her students could be just as polite saying, ‘Can you help me? I want to …,’ she looked at me incredulously, finding it hard to believe that a ‘Can you …’ phrase would be as polite as a ‘I was wondering if you could …’ phrase …
After all, that’s not what the coursebooks say!
I find myself being reminded of the story of Pygmalion, the sculptor who carved a woman out of ivory, and then fell in love with it.
Like Pygmalion, we created something that worked for us … and we’ve fallen in love with it. We made the description of language simple so that more of us could understand it. But now, that description has now become the rule and we find ourselves fervently correcting others’ ‘mistakes’ and applying the rules as if they were there from the beginning.
Are we inherently perpetuating our own myths about language?
Extract for those who won’t.
We all have stuff that works for us, but the Law book is still the primary source for learners.
We all make mistakes, both on the field of play and off (at the bar afterwards.)