[Law] Penalty kicked over dead ball line

Joe@trfc

New member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
19
Post Likes
1
Current Referee grade:
Level 9
Hi,

Blue team awarded a penalty on Reds 10 metre line.
Blue takes the penalty with gusto and it goes through Reds dead ball area and over the dead ball line.

I awarded a 22 metre drop out, should it have been a scrum where the penalty was taken?
 

Flish


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
1,521
Post Likes
351
Location
Durham
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
Assuming kick from hand not place kick, then options, scrum back or 22 - I did exactly the same thing a few weeks back
 

Decorily

Coach/Referee
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
1,563
Post Likes
425
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
Presuming it wasn’t a kick at goal....
Then options 22 or scrum.
 

Phil E


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
16,084
Post Likes
2,350
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
I awarded a 22 metre drop out, should it have been a scrum where the penalty was taken?

As others have already pointed out, it should have been a choice of either.

[LAWS]Law 21
BALL KICKED DEAD THROUGH IN-GOAL
12. If a team kicks the ball through their opponents’ in-goal from the field of play into touchin-
goal or on or over the dead-ball line, the defending team can choose :
a. To have a drop-out anywhere on or behind the 22-metre line; or
b. To have a scrum at the place where the ball was kicked.
Exception : An unsuccessful kick at goal or attempted dropped goal. In these cases, the
defending team restarts with a 22-metre drop-out.[/LAWS]
 

SimonSmith


Referees in Australia
Staff member
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
9,352
Post Likes
1,455
Was it a place kick at goal? I'm not clear from the OP if it was or not
 

Joe@trfc

New member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
19
Post Likes
1
Current Referee grade:
Level 9
Thanks everyone

I thought, as it was a penalty, the Blue team should get some advantage.

I can't see why a kick at goal should be special
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,810
Post Likes
3,148
the scrum back option is because WR want to discourage long range speculative kicks into the opponent's in goal, or (if it wasn't there) kicks designed specifically just to force a 22'

but they don't want to discourage attempts at goal, so no scrum back option for them
 
Last edited:

chbg


Referees in England
Joined
May 15, 2009
Messages
1,483
Solutions
1
Post Likes
443
Current Referee grade:
Level 7
And not just over the dead-ball line either - it is the same for touch-in-goal (as Law 21.12 states). So a PK from hand that just goes the wrong side of the GL/Touch flag results in options (22 or scrum), rather than the 5m LO it would have been if successful.
 

Marc Wakeham


Referees in Wales
Joined
Jan 5, 2018
Messages
2,778
Post Likes
842
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Thanks everyone

I thought, as it was a penalty, the Blue team should get some advantage.

I can't see why a kick at goal should be special

By definition, A kick at goal should have enough "wellie" to take it into in-goal if not through or out the other side. It would be totally against the spirit of the game to, effectively, "double penalise" a failed attempt at goal.
 
Top