Ruling 2: 2009 (revised)

[Agustin]

This ruling states that the outcome of simultaneous grounding in-goal and being touch-in-goal results in a 22m drop out.

I am inferring the condition that the attacking team took the ball into the in-goal in the first place. If it was taken in by the defending team I would award a 5m scrum.

 

[The umpire]

So would I.

 

[chopper15]

This ruling states that the outcome of simultaneous grounding in-goal and being touch-in-goal results in a 22m drop out.

I am inferring the condition that the attacking team took the ball into the in-goal in the first place. If it was taken in by the defending team I would award a 5m scrum.

How come I can't get access?

 

[Phil E]

This ruling states that the outcome of simultaneous grounding in-goal and being touch-in-goal results in a 22m drop out.

I am inferring the condition that the attacking team took the ball into the in-goal in the first place. If it was taken in by the defending team I would award a 5m scrum.

You infer correct. The ruling says:

A player carrying the ball attempts to score a try

So it was an attacker that took the ball in, which is why they say 22 DO.

 

[Dixie]

How come I can't get access?

Try downloading Adobe Acrobat Reader 9. If you have that, I can't think why Agustin's .pdf won't open for you.