I feel we are seeing a symptom and not the true cause.
I ask why are we not able to perform for 80 mins and why do we consider a short period of fightback as acceptable.
When England play fast and hard from the outset it sets up a great game but too often they retreat into a kicking game. They are not fully confident, forget arrogance but justifiably confident, in their skill, fitness, ability, preparation and game plan to win the game. The only goal of sport!
They kick ball away because they are afraid to lose, they are playing chicken with the opposition but in fact they are the ones that are scared of making mistakes. I wish they would demonstrate flair and confidence, to challenge and take on defenders, to use pace, to exploit gaps and to use the ball effectively. But they don't and we can all see this underperforming and we make our judgments, for me the coach was not using the resources effectively and has not been for a number of years.
OF is not a captain as he is unable to observe and react effectively to a game that unfolds in a different manner to the one he has been prepared for. His ability is so lacking that he cannot assess and verbalise in the post match interview, without having someone coach him through the video, where it went wrong!
Is it too late to correct this before RWC, perhaps but I would rather see a team that has a plan, is seeking to establish an identity, see growth and progress as key areas of focus rather than just having a fear of losing.
Debentures = money grabbing opportunity not grass root rugby fans.
ETA - maybe that's why at the moment I find the women's game so much better to watch.