look, if you disagree, then do so.
please stop attacking people - well, one person's - integrity. You've been warned before.
same goes for everyone. This does NOT devolve into jibes at the person.
I actually admire and am jealous of some of the forensic presentation skills often displayed by the aforementioned poster, and have said so on previous occassions, however I'm perfectly within my rights on a public forum to say when I feel any poster is taking a selective approach to any subject, let's not forget this posters legendary ability to say what he likes to anyone ! So save your sycophanticism its unnecessary and unwanted.
If however you saying that the full follow through of Hoopers shovestrike was accidentally omitted when the 'cutting' was offerred as "absolute proof" then I suggest you are blindly reinforcing the adhoring support of your buddy that you've uttered at me previously. Thanks, zzzzzz
The poster self declares as an expert at such media presentation things, so i dismiss the notion that the sample 'selected' clip was accidentally foreshortened and i merely offer up the suggestion that it was so manufactured to try and promote his own view, which coincidentally is against a forthcoming NZAB opponent.
As for targeting, if you do some genuine data analysis you'll soon see both a disproportionate response rate and spikey language used aimed at this postee.
If you don't agree, or indeed can't be arsed, then sobeit and tough in equal proportion, you can own that prerogative without the lecture thank you.