Full report
here
Summary: collision wasn't solely his fault; outburst warranted a consecutive sanction, not concurrent with collision sanction. (I think if they thought the red was inappropriate they could have applied no further sanction.)
Last 3 paragraphs:
The above mitigation refers to the act of foul play. We have deducted 2 weeks (more than
50%) by application of Regulation 19.11.13. He is entitled to full credit (50%) for the features of mitigation identified above. In real terms that would mean 1 week with a starting point of 3 weeks. However, S14 destabilised the Player with the effect that he contributed materially to the subsequent collision with S15. Therefore in the context of offending of this type, we assessed the Player's fault as minimal such that a suspension of 2 weeks would be wholly
disproportionate. Accordingly we deducted a further week with a resulting suspension of 1
week.
Turning to the Rule 5.12 charge, there are no guidelines for such matters. Our powers are wide. We considered and found some assistance in Appendix 2, though we recognised that it does not apply directly. The low end entry point for a breach of Law 10.4(m) by way of a 'general' act contrary to good sportsmanship is 4 weeks. With his mitigation that would properly be reduced to 2 weeks. If we were minded to suspend the Player, Mr Jones invited
us to order it to run concurrently with the sanction for 10.4(i) matter. As a matter of principle, we considered that would be inappropriate. This was a separate matter, an act of dissent following his red card and therefore merited an additional sanction.
However, we considered that a total sanction of 4 weeks was disproportionate to the level of his overall offending (per Regulation 19.11.14) and so reduced what would have been 2 weeks (for the Rule 5.12) to 1 week. That will run consecutively to the 1 week for the law 10.4(i) making a total of 2 weeks. We also reprimand him and warn him about his future conduct. With his professional and international status goes responsibility which he knows includes respecting match officials and their decisions.