2016 LAW TRIALS - Definition changes

Ian_Cook


Referees in New Zealand
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
13,680
Post Likes
1,760
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
POSSESSION

Current: This happens when a player carrying the ball or the team has the ball in its control; for example the ball in one half of a scrum or ruck is in that team’s possession

Proposal: This happens when a player is carrying the ball (or attempting to bring it under control) or the team has the ball in its control; for example the ball in one half of a scrum or ruck is in that team’s possession.

Rationale: Clarifies that when a player is juggling with the ball in an attempt to bring it under control he is in possession and if he puts his foot into touch, the ball is in touch.

Law 19 Definition 6

Current: The ball is in touch if a player catches the ball and that player has a foot on the touchline or the ground beyond the touchline. If a player has one foot in the field of play and one foot in touch and holds the ball, the ball is in touch.

Proposal: The ball is in touch if a player catches the ball and that player has a foot on the touchline or the ground beyond the touchline. If the ball had not reached the touchline when the player catches it, the player has taken the ball into touch.

Rationale: Change encourages the catcher to keep the ball in play.

Law 19 Definition 8

Current: If a player jumps and catches the ball, both feet must land in the playing area, otherwise the ball is in touch or touch-in-goal.

Proposal:
If a player jumps and catches a ball that has reached the plane of touch both feet must land in the playing area, otherwise the ball is in touch. If the player does not land in the playing area the player has NOT taken the ball into touch.
If a player jumps and catches a ball that has not reached the plane of touch both feet must land in the playing area, otherwise the ball is in touch. If the player does not land in the playing area the player has taken the ball into touch.
If a player jumps from the playing area and plays a ball that has reached the plane of touch the ball is not in touch if the ball lands within the playing area. If the ball does not land in the playing area the player has taken the ball into touch.
If a player, who has either or both feet on or beyond the touchline, picks up a ball in the playing area then the ball is in touch and the player picking it up has taken the ball into touch

Rationale Clarifies the Law and makes decision making easier for the Assistant Referee
Permits a player to return a ball to the playing area thus extending ball in play time.
Deters a player who is in touch from catching or picking up a ball that has not reached the touchline thus encouraging the receiving player to keep the ball in play and extending ball in play time.
 

menace


Referees in Australia
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
3,657
Post Likes
633
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
If a player, who has either or both feet on or beyond the touchline, picks up a ball in the playing area then the ball is in touch and the player picking it up has taken the ball into touch.

I haven't checked the other trials posted by Ian but I wonder if similar principles will apply to dead ball line, touch in goal, and putting ball in goal? If not then it would seem to add an inconsistent layer....
 

ChrisR

Player or Coach
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
3,231
Post Likes
356
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
If a player jumps and catches a ball that has reached the plane of touch both feet must land in the playing area, otherwise the ball is in touch.


Yes! A player can now leap from touch, catch the ball and land in the FOP. Removes the requirement for the referee to judge location of ball relative to touch.
 

Pinky


Referees in Scotland
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
1,521
Post Likes
192
If a player jumps and catches a ball that has reached the plane of touch both feet must land in the playing area, otherwise the ball is in touch.


Yes! A player can now leap from touch, catch the ball and land in the FOP. Removes the requirement for the referee to judge location of ball relative to touch.

But not if he is standing and catches it when the referee now needs to decide if it "reached the touchline" or not. Do you think they meant reached the plane of touch? or were they just realisiing that if the ball was caught it can't have reached the touchline.

Seems to me this all makes it more likely that playing the ball neat the touchline will give opponents the put in, so expect to see less catching near the touchlines and more kicking for position.
 

beckett50


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 31, 2004
Messages
2,514
Post Likes
224
Current Referee grade:
Level 6
POSSESSION


Law 19 Definition 6

Current: The ball is in touch if a player catches the ball and that player has a foot on the touchline or the ground beyond the touchline. If a player has one foot in the field of play and one foot in touch and holds the ball, the ball is in touch.

Proposal: The ball is in touch if a player catches the ball and that player has a foot on the touchline or the ground beyond the touchline. If the ball had not reached the touchline when the player catches it, the player has taken the ball into touch.

Rationale: Change encourages the catcher to keep the ball in play.

.

Ok, so maybe I've missed something here. Definition 8 makes reference to the In-Goal area, but this doesn't. Are to assume that a player can still stand with one foot beyond the deadfall line and make the ball dead thereby earning a scrum back (as opposed to a normal 22m dropout)?
 

Pinky


Referees in Scotland
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
1,521
Post Likes
192
Ok, so maybe I've missed something here. Definition 8 makes reference to the In-Goal area, but this doesn't. Are to assume that a player can still stand with one foot beyond the deadfall line and make the ball dead thereby earning a scrum back (as opposed to a normal 22m dropout)?

No, I think they are changing that to so that the ball has to make it over the DBL TIG line under its own steam to get the scrum back.
 
Top