Reading the thread on marks from penalty kicks, etc and Mr Joubert's classic the other day I'm wondering if anybody else wants to confess their sins.
I did once call play-on when a player called for a mark from a penalty, must have sold it 'cos nobody batted an eyelid.
I had a classic a couple of weeks ago. Blue attacking with a driving maul, going forward. red #4 bound into the middle of the maul reaches over with both hands to try and reach the ball. I call 'red 4 leave it you're not bound on.' Give him his due he stops and next breakdown he quite rightly and politely asks for an explanation.
I tell him, "you must be bound on with at least one hand," and even as my mouth is uttering these words, my brain is thinking, 'that is complete tosh he was bound in by other players.' Too late the words have been spoken!
Off he trots with, 'never heard that one before, leaving me thinking, 'Neither have I'.
So over to my fellow Rugby-refs
I did once call play-on when a player called for a mark from a penalty, must have sold it 'cos nobody batted an eyelid.
I had a classic a couple of weeks ago. Blue attacking with a driving maul, going forward. red #4 bound into the middle of the maul reaches over with both hands to try and reach the ball. I call 'red 4 leave it you're not bound on.' Give him his due he stops and next breakdown he quite rightly and politely asks for an explanation.
I tell him, "you must be bound on with at least one hand," and even as my mouth is uttering these words, my brain is thinking, 'that is complete tosh he was bound in by other players.' Too late the words have been spoken!
Off he trots with, 'never heard that one before, leaving me thinking, 'Neither have I'.
- :redface:
So over to my fellow Rugby-refs