Diving over the ruck to score

Ciaran Trainor


Referees in England
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Messages
2,855
Post Likes
364
Location
Walney Island
Current Referee grade:
Level 7
So diving over to score a try appears to be ok, what about jumping over in open play to make a break
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,813
Post Likes
3,152
ctrainor:286110 said:
So diving over to score a try appears to be ok, what about jumping over in open play to make a break

Scrum half makes a pop pass to incoming centre who hurdles the ruck?

For me clearly dangerous, someone is likely to receive a boot to the head
 

Ian_Cook


Referees in New Zealand
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
13,684
Post Likes
1,771
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Scrum half makes a pop pass to incoming centre who hurdles the ruck?

For me clearly dangerous, someone is likely to receive a boot to the head

Yes, I agree, but this is not in any way., shape or form the same as diving over players on the ground.
 

Jarrod Burton


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
725
Post Likes
208
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
I'm struggling with seeing how this is legal.

If a 9 picks up the ball at the back of a ruck just behind the goal line and while diving to score over his knee or elbow catches one of the defenders on the head getting to his feet at the back of the ruck - what would you do?

Many agree that hurdling players in open play can be done on a "any contact with the boot on the hurdled player constitutes foul play" basis, so does that mean any contact from the attackers legs on any of the defenders (including those in the ex-ruck) would constitute foul play when leaping over an ex-ruck?
 

Dickie E


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
14,161
Post Likes
2,167
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Scrum half makes a pop pass to incoming centre who hurdles the ruck?

For me clearly dangerous, someone is likely to receive a boot to the head

could the defending team lie on the ground head to toe across the field from touch line to touch line about 10 metres out from their own goal line? At some point an attacker would need to jump over one of them and hence be guilty of foul play
 

Ian_Cook


Referees in New Zealand
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
13,684
Post Likes
1,771
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
I'm struggling with seeing how this is legal.

If a 9 picks up the ball at the back of a ruck just behind the goal line and while diving to score over his knee or elbow catches one of the defenders on the head getting to his feet at the back of the ruck - what would you do?


How is this any different from the 9 trying to blast his way through two or three tacklers and an elbow catching one of them in the head as he does so.
 

Browner

Banned
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
6,000
Post Likes
270
I'm struggling with seeing how this is legal.

If a 9 picks up the ball at the back of a ruck just behind the goal line and while diving to score over his knee or elbow catches one of the defenders on the head getting to his feet at the back of the ruck - what would you do?
If it was C&O foul play I'd penalise, if not, I'd award the try.
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,813
Post Likes
3,152
could the defending team lie on the ground head to toe across the field from touch line to touch line about 10 metres out from their own goal line? At some point an attacker would need to jump over one of them and hence be guilty of foul play

nah, take the easy drop goal :pepper:
 

SimonSmith


Referees in Australia
Staff member
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
9,385
Post Likes
1,486
So, the ball carrier has the ball at the back of the ruck. With all his players in front of him. And he jumps over them. Using them as a shield from would-be tacklers.

Some might consider that to be offside/blocking/obstruction.
 

winchesterref


Referees in England
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
2,014
Post Likes
197
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
Would be tacklers are looking elsewhere/not in a position to defend... if he was my TMO - "Patrick, was it material?" ;)
 

ddjamo


Referees in Canada
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
2,912
Post Likes
135
this issue is not addressed specifically in law. it is basically a situation that needs to have a decision made on the spot. trying to attach absolutes is not going to work. if you do you will run into things like, "well he dove over his head and that's dangerous...but if he dives over outstretched legs - that's okay..." what will you allow? anything? some? or penalize it every time?

make the decision on the day IMO. isn't that our purpose?
 
Top