Dragged into touch

FightOrFlight


Referees in Ireland
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
175
Post Likes
12
Reffing a game today. Red v Blue. Blue player tackled 4m in from touch with a primary red tackler and an assist. Primary rolls away as per but red assist is on feet and has a hold of the Blue jersey(no release) and drags him the remaining 4m or so into touch. I PKed red assist for not releasing in the tackle much to their displeasure.

It was all a fairly fluid movement. Tackled player goes down and once he hits the ground he is dragged off into touch.

Thoughts?
 

talbazar


Referees in Singapore
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
702
Post Likes
81
Sounds like a good call to me:
- Correct against the law
- Avoiding potential flashpoint

My 2 cents,
Pierre.
 

menace


Referees in Australia
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
3,657
Post Likes
633
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Spot on. No issue.
(Just remind them they're not playing rugby league)

Unfortunately I think too many refs miss this one as such players think they can legally do it. Another urban myth in the making.
 

Dickie E


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
14,132
Post Likes
2,153
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Reffing a game today. Red v Blue. Blue player tackled 4m in from touch with a primary red tackler and an assist. Primary rolls away as per but red assist is on feet and has a hold of the Blue jersey(no release) and drags him the remaining 4m or so into touch. I PKed red assist for not releasing in the tackle much to their displeasure.

It was all a fairly fluid movement. Tackled player goes down and once he hits the ground he is dragged off into touch.

Thoughts?

Agree with your call but let me ask this:

Let's say Red tackle assist DID clearly release Blue player but then re-grasps Blue player and drags him into touch. Decision?
 

FightOrFlight


Referees in Ireland
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
175
Post Likes
12
Agree with your call but let me ask this:

Let's say Red tackle assist DID clearly release Blue player but then re-grasps Blue player and drags him into touch. Decision?

I thought that after the game. Once the tackler(s) releases I'm looking for the ball carrier to release the ball next. If he was to do so it would negate the need to drag him into touch. I may PK the tackled player for not releasing the ball under however in that scenario:

[LAWS] 15.5 (a)
A tackled player must not lie on, over, or near the ball to prevent opponents from gaining possession of it, and must try to make the ball available immediately so that play can continue.

(b) A tackled player must immediately pass the ball or release it. That player must also get up or move away from it at once.[/LAWS]

Being dragged away would fulfill the moving away part for me and I would tell the player to stop dragging him had he released to avoid hassle and as he now has no reason to do so.

In my scenario I would imagine the primary tackler would be after the ball sharpish however.
 

menace


Referees in Australia
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
3,657
Post Likes
633
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Agree with your call but let me ask this:

Let's say Red tackle assist DID clearly release Blue player but then re-grasps Blue player and drags him into touch. Decision?

Probably the same as BC was not tackled but went to ground a la law 14? And was then grabbed and dragged into touch.
 

Dickie E


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
14,132
Post Likes
2,153
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Probably the same as BC was not tackled but went to ground a la law 14? And was then grabbed and dragged into touch.

Could be. So what is your decision? I think play on.
 

menace


Referees in Australia
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
3,657
Post Likes
633
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
I think it's one you need to see and judge on feel (ie how far the drag, how long the time to do something 'immediately'..etc etc). There could be cause for PK against the BC for not letting go of the ball.

But yes , like you, I'm inclined to 'play on'....more for not rewarding the stupidity of the opponent for not playing at the ball in-field (which could have earnt his side cheap turnover or a PK rather than a lowly and risky line out throw in).
 

Dickie E


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
14,132
Post Likes
2,153
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Stu Berry may disagree with us:

http://www.sareferees.com/ref-replies/duty-ref-484--stuart-berry/2829616/

Question: Law 14 question. In situations where a player either goes to ground to gain possession or is a ball carrier who ends up on the ground when there has not been a tackle, the laws are reasonably clear as to the actions required by both the player with the ball and opposition players who are on their feet and are attempting to play the ball. However, the laws say virtually nothing about players, in opposition to the player in possession, grasping the ball carrier and dragging him into touch. The laws are written in a way that assumes such players are attempting to play the ball but we sometimes see the defender ignore the ball and simply attempt to grasp the player on the ground and drag him into touch. Do you have guidelines, other than the formal Laws of The Game, suggesting how such situations should be refereed? Cheers, Ross

Stuart Berry: Hi Ross – once a player has gone to ground, a defender cannot ‘drag’ that player around the field, whether it be into touch or simply to change his body position. This is a PK offence.
 

menace


Referees in Australia
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
3,657
Post Likes
633
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
But lucky I don't referee in SA!
Pity he couldn't give a law reference to back up his thinking.

7.1 has "Any player may tackle, hold or push an opponent holding the ball.". So you can push them out but not pull them out?
They are not tackled...hence law 14..and therefore you can push them out and by extension you must be able to pull them out?

(I think we've done this one already a few months ago? and I've probably contradicted myself from what I said then?!)

I think Stu Berry answered before actually thinking? :shrug:
 
Last edited:

Lee Lifeson-Peart


Referees in England
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Messages
7,810
Post Likes
1,004
Current Referee grade:
Level 6
Let's wheel out the Gordon Tallis/Brett Hodgson youtube clip! :pepper:
 

Shelflife


Referees in Ireland
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
627
Post Likes
156
If a player is stupid enough to try and drag a player on the ground 4m rather than go for the ball then thats a pen for tackling a player without the ball, assuming that the player on the ground has released and placed the ball then its a pen for playing a man without the ball.
 

menace


Referees in Australia
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
3,657
Post Likes
633
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
It was/is in rugby league world. As it wasn't a 'completed' tackle as the bc, although off his feet, was not stationary ( momentum arrested). That law may changed now though but I'm not sure. (Calling leagueref) :shrug:
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,811
Post Likes
3,149
It was/is in rugby league world. As it wasn't a 'completed' tackle as the bc, although off his feet, was not stationary ( momentum arrested). That law may changed now though but I'm not sure. (Calling leagueref) :shrug:

ah. didn't realise it was league (blush).
that also explains why I hadn't seen it before!
 

4eyesbetter


Referees in England
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Messages
1,320
Post Likes
86
It was/is in rugby league world. As it wasn't a 'completed' tackle as the bc, although off his feet, was not stationary ( momentum arrested). That law may changed now though but I'm not sure. (Calling leagueref) :shrug:

In England we now think this is dangerous; you can push but not drag. (The tackle is not complete until the ball-carrying arm hits the ground.) Can't speak for the NRL.
 
Top