European Rugby Champions Cup : Munster v Saracens

Browner

Banned
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
6,000
Post Likes
270

Dixie


Referees in England
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
12,773
Post Likes
338
Anybody feel in could/should have been red, as it was certainly dangerous play.
The difficulty is that elite rugby has connived in this practice. Why is it not ALWAYS illegal to use a judo technique to take a man to ground when he doesn't have the ball? Having allowed what is always illegal, the game is hypocritical if it starts red carding players for doing it.

I suspect that the YC decision arose (remember, it was a TMO referral, so well viewed in retrospect) because Gill had no way of knowing his target was also being lifted (or at least supported as a fulcrum) by his team mate. But could easily have been red.
 

RobLev

Rugby Expert
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
2,170
Post Likes
244
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
The difficulty is that elite rugby has connived in this practice. Why is it not ALWAYS illegal to use a judo technique to take a man to ground when he doesn't have the ball? Having allowed what is always illegal, the game is hypocritical if it starts red carding players for doing it.

I suspect that the YC decision arose (remember, it was a TMO referral, so well viewed in retrospect) because Gill had no way of knowing his target was also being lifted (or at least supported as a fulcrum) by his team mate. But could easily have been red.

I can't work out whether there was anything remotely legal about either the intention or the execution. He's not even got the excuse that he's clearing the victim out of the ruck - he dropped him right in the middle of it. It's irrelevant whether he knew that his team-mate was acting similarly illegally the other side of the victim. RC for Gill - and a YC for his accomplice.
 

Pegleg

Rugby Expert
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
3,330
Post Likes
536
Current Referee grade:
Level 3
Red without a doubt for me.
 
Top