In one of the sevens matches I refereed on the weekend, teams were showing up in blue and blue. One blue was a shade darker but there was no other difference between shirts, shorts or socks. Needless to say we were running late, short of refs and the teams said they'd tried to find other shirts but didn't.
Because there was no other good option and I knew it was unlikely to be a close-fought match, I went ahead with the match.
It went fine, team slightly-darker-blue won by 5 tries (I had expected more) and I told teams not to complain about my line-out and ruck calls (needless to say there were no touch judges).
Another referee told me I shouldn't have gone ahead with the game in case there was an incident. What do you think?
Because there was no other good option and I knew it was unlikely to be a close-fought match, I went ahead with the match.
It went fine, team slightly-darker-blue won by 5 tries (I had expected more) and I told teams not to complain about my line-out and ruck calls (needless to say there were no touch judges).
Another referee told me I shouldn't have gone ahead with the game in case there was an incident. What do you think?