ChuckieB
Rugby Expert
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2017
- Messages
- 1,057
- Post Likes
- 115
- Current Referee grade:
- Select Grade
So in the same vein, in the brumbies vs the reds currently on telly:
for those that will have seen it,:
Brumbies try which, had it not have been been actually scored, was just about to have been been called a PT for a deliberately collapsed maul. The maul was moving forward dominantly with little chance to defend effectively.
There was the question by the commentator as to whether the PT would have then been accompanied by a YC had he been required to resort to the PT decision.
He suggests yes ( although we know we never set store by what a commentator says ��
. I suggest yes.
As I see it, this would again leave me at odds with many others based on the most recent part of the thread.
It never came to it, so it's an open question?
Cheers.
CB
for those that will have seen it,:
Brumbies try which, had it not have been been actually scored, was just about to have been been called a PT for a deliberately collapsed maul. The maul was moving forward dominantly with little chance to defend effectively.
There was the question by the commentator as to whether the PT would have then been accompanied by a YC had he been required to resort to the PT decision.
He suggests yes ( although we know we never set store by what a commentator says ��
. I suggest yes. As I see it, this would again leave me at odds with many others based on the most recent part of the thread.
It never came to it, so it's an open question?
Cheers.
CB