Matters not - the question is whether the pressure had a reasonable influence on the plane of the ball...
Please explain in as plain English as possible what the term "influence on the plane of the ball" actually means
Matters not - the question is whether the pressure had a reasonable influence on the plane of the ball...
Please explain in as plain English as possible what the term "influence on the plane of the ball" actually means
It must mean something to RL refs; presumably, however, a contact that makes not a ha'porth of difference to the behaviour of the ball, like Hall's, isn't sufficient grounding to constitute a try.
Please explain in as plain English as possible what the term "influence on the plane of the ball" actually means
Yes to all Australians , they are surprised they only found 3 !So we have 3 ex-Australian referees supporting the decision in favour of an Australian team by an Australian video ref and an Australian ref - is that really a surprise!
I am not trying to put you on the spot but then if that were the case if a ball was stationary on the ground and the "tryscorer" merely put his fingers on the ball with downwards pressure and the ball started stock still in its original position there is no try - surely not!!