The issue for me is preventing the team walking in using that to generate momentum for the lift. Having lifted in the line-out believe me it makes a difference, and crucially also saves energy..
that's an interesting point.
The issue for me is preventing the team walking in using that to generate momentum for the lift. Having lifted in the line-out believe me it makes a difference, and crucially also saves energy..
so NO huddle at all, even a really brief one ?
... or if you do allow them a brief huddle 10m back, why not allow it 3m back ?
When a team puts in fewer players than 7 then tries to take a throw before opposition has had time to match in order to milk a FK, some refs declare that they won't be enforcing the numbers requirement on the non-throwing team.
If they want to walk in, fine, but pause then jump/lift. Otherwise I believe they are getting an unfair advantge over the defending side.
.
Do you guys still see sides trying to con a "numbers" FK?
didds
As for the walking in bit of the OP; it is case of managing it like a scrum engage. Tell the team throwing in, as they walk in for the first line out, that they must "set before they go". This gives the oppo a chance to change where they are standing, lifters and challengers etc, and makes for a fair contest.
The issue for me is preventing the team walking in using that to generate momentum for the lift. Having lifted in the line-out believe me it makes a difference, and crucially also saves energy.
If they want to walk in, fine, but pause then jump/lift. Otherwise I believe they are getting an unfair advantge over the defending side.
If it continues what's to stop the defending side doing it, we could have lineouts starting with teams 10m (or more) apart.