[Law] Ball bounces off team mates head !!!

rugbyslave

Getting to know the game
Joined
Nov 9, 2012
Messages
134
Post Likes
6
Current Referee grade:
Level 15 - 11
The ball is passed from the 10 to 12, 12 is not looking, ball bounces off 12's head and the 10 receives the ball back, I guess no knock-on but is 10 not off-side. The ball only hits the 12 on the head, no body else involved and does not bounce off the ground. Referee says "No Knock-on off the head".
 

Camquin

Rugby Expert
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
1,653
Post Likes
310
If the pass was flat and 10 slowed after giving the pass then sprints to catch the ball, I suppose 10 could have got behind 12 and so be on side at the moment of impact.
 

Rushforth


Referees in Holland
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
1,300
Post Likes
92
http://laws.worldrugby.org/?law=12

[LAWS]DEFINITION: KNOCK-ON

A knock-on occurs when a player loses possession of the ball and it goes forward, or when a player hits the ball forward with the hand or arm, or when the ball hits the hand or arm and goes forward, and the ball touches the ground or another player before the original player can catch it.

‘Forward’ means towards the opposing team’s dead ball line.

If a player in tackling an opponent makes contact with the ball and the ball goes forward from the ball carrier’s hands, that is a knock-on.

If a player rips the ball or deliberately knocks the ball from an opponent's hands and the ball goes forward from the ball carrier's hands, that is not a knock-on.[/LAWS]

Good call.

Edit: except I didn't read the OP correctly.
 

Taff


Referees in Wales
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
6,942
Post Likes
383
The ball is passed from the 10 to 12, 12 is not looking, ball bounces off 12's head and the 10 receives the ball back, I guess no knock-on but is 10 not off-side.
As Camquin says, I suppose the key question is was No 10 in front of No 12 or not?

If he was in front, then I think I would call it accidental offside (scrum) rather than deliberate offside which is a PK offence.

If No 10 was level with or behind No 12 - then play on.
 
Last edited:

L'irlandais

, Promises to Referee in France
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
4,724
Post Likes
325
My feeling is it was the correct call.
[laws]Law 12 excludes this.
EXCEPTION
Bounce forward. If the ball is not thrown forward but it hits a player or the ground and bounces forward, this is not a throw forward.[/laws]So it is neither a knock-on (no hands) nor a throw forward. Play on!
 

The Fat


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
4,204
Post Likes
496
My feeling is it was the correct call.
[laws]Law 12 excludes this.
EXCEPTION
Bounce forward. If the ball is not thrown forward but it hits a player or the ground and bounces forward, this is not a throw forward.[/laws]So it is neither a knock-on (no hands) nor a throw forward. Play on!

I think you are missing the point of the OP.
The 10 throws a legal pass to his 12, but the ball hits the 12 in the head and basically rebounds forward to the 10 again.
We all agree that 12 has not knocked the ball on (so referee's call is correct in that regard), but from the description, the 10 is still in front of the 12.
I would go with Taff and award a scrum to the opposition for accidental offside, unless the ball bounced off the 12's head and 10 made a deliberate (not reflex) action to recover the ball in which case it would then be a PK for offside.
 

ChrisR

Player or Coach
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
3,231
Post Likes
356
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
I think I'd be laughing too hard to whistle anything!
 

RobLev

Rugby Expert
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
2,170
Post Likes
244
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
As Camquin says, I suppose the key question is was No 10 in front of No 12 or not?

If he was in front, then I think I would call it accidental offside (scrum) rather than deliberate offside which is a PK offence.

If No 10 was level with or behind No 12 - then play on.

He might have been accidentally offside, but it couldn't be accidental offside (defined in Law 11.6(a)):

[LAWS]When an offside player cannot avoid being touched by the ball or by a team-mate carrying it, the player is accidentally offside.[/LAWS]

He deliberately caught it - therefore could have avoided being touched by it.
 

didds

Resident Club Coach
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,072
Post Likes
1,800
My feeling is it was the correct call.
[laws]Law 12 excludes this.
EXCEPTION
Bounce forward. If the ball is not thrown forward but it hits a player or the ground and bounces forward, this is not a throw forward.[/laws]So it is neither a knock-on (no hands) nor a throw forward. Play on!

except that if the 10 was in front of a team mate that last played the ball etc...

didds
 

Rushforth


Referees in Holland
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
1,300
Post Likes
92
He might have been accidentally offside, but it couldn't be accidental offside (defined in Law 11.6(a)):

[LAWS]When an offside player cannot avoid being touched by the ball or by a team-mate carrying it, the player is accidentally offside.[/LAWS]

He deliberately caught it - therefore could have avoided being touched by it.

There is deliberate and deliberate. We've all seen the more obvious case of a player (often new) in front of a potential catcher (who has clearly knocked on) automatically collect the ball, which prevents advantage from being taken. Generally we would penalise that (perhaps not in a friendly, but in that case we might not want the scrum either).

From the scenario as presented (and being awake now), it seems as if the referee decided "play on" based on the fact their hadn't been a knock-on to get advantage from, and called "no knock on" to clarify. Perhaps not correct in law, but not a bad decision, at the level where the 12 is facing the other way and the 10 aims he pass at the back of his head....
 

talbazar


Referees in Singapore
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
702
Post Likes
81
He might have been accidentally offside, but it couldn't be accidental offside (defined in Law 11.6(a)):

[LAWS]When an offside player cannot avoid being touched by the ball or by a team-mate carrying it, the player is accidentally offside.[/LAWS]

He deliberately caught it - therefore could have avoided being touched by it.

Maybe, maybe not... Catching (or any purposely way of "playing" the ball) is not enough to "judge" if the player may or may not have been able to avoid the ball...
 

rugbyslave

Getting to know the game
Joined
Nov 9, 2012
Messages
134
Post Likes
6
Current Referee grade:
Level 15 - 11
In general play a player is offside if the player is in front of a team-mate who is carrying the ball, or in front of a team-mate who last played the ball.

Definition:played:The ball is played when it is touched by a player.

Accidental offside scrum non-offending team !!
 

RobLev

Rugby Expert
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
2,170
Post Likes
244
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
In general play a player is offside if the player is in front of a team-mate who is carrying the ball, or in front of a team-mate who last played the ball.

Definition:played:The ball is played when it is touched by a player.

Accidental offside scrum non-offending team !!

Why "accidental offside", given the quoted definition of that term?
 

Taff


Referees in Wales
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
6,942
Post Likes
383
The time difference between the ball leaving the hands, bouncing off his teammates head and bouncing back into No 10s hands must be tiny. I take your point Roblev, but I just think No 10 won't have the time to react, and that a PK for offside would be a bit harsh.
 

OB..


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
22,981
Post Likes
1,838
The time difference between the ball leaving the hands, bouncing off his teammates head and bouncing back into No 10s hands must be tiny. I take your point Roblev, but I just think No 10 won't have the time to react, and that a PK for offside would be a bit harsh.
If you know the ball has come from a team-mate behind you, your rugby instinct should be to try and avoid it. If it still hits you and bounces off, the opponents might have the chance to play advantage.

If you do cannot realistically be expected to know if the ball came from a team-mate or an opponent, I can see the case for accidental offside.
 

RobLev

Rugby Expert
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
2,170
Post Likes
244
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
The time difference between the ball leaving the hands, bouncing off his teammates head and bouncing back into No 10s hands must be tiny. I take your point Roblev, but I just think No 10 won't have the time to react, and that a PK for offside would be a bit harsh.

If that's what's happened - if you can credibly argue that #10 couldn't avoid the ball - then accidental offside. But if he reacted fast deliberately to catch it - that is not accidental offside.
 

talbazar


Referees in Singapore
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
702
Post Likes
81
If that's what's happened - if you can credibly argue that #10 couldn't avoid the ball - then accidental offside. But if he reacted fast deliberately to catch it - that is not accidental offside.

So if we play together and you're slightly in front of me, retreating. I kick and miss it badly (as always coz I can't kick) so that the ball travels straight to your face:
Option 1: out of reflex you catch the ball --> ref blows PK for offside.
Option 2: too slow to do anything you take the ball on your nose --> ref blows scrum for accidental offside.
:pepper:
That's how it should happen according to you?
Did I get it right?
:hap:
PS: this is meant to be a funny way of putting the "absolute rule" you describe above.
All I'm saying is: let's use a bit of common sense and empathy and see what actually has happened...
:biggrin:

Cheers,
Pierre.
 

RobLev

Rugby Expert
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
2,170
Post Likes
244
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
So if we play together and you're slightly in front of me, retreating. I kick and miss it badly (as always coz I can't kick) so that the ball travels straight to your face:
Option 1: out of reflex you catch the ball --> ref blows PK for offside.
Option 2: too slow to do anything you take the ball on your nose --> ref blows scrum for accidental offside.
:pepper:
That's how it should happen according to you?
Did I get it right?
:hap:
PS: this is meant to be a funny way of putting the "absolute rule" you describe above.
All I'm saying is: let's use a bit of common sense and empathy and see what actually has happened...
:biggrin:

Cheers,
Pierre.

No. Could I avoid being touched by the ball?
 

Phil E


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
16,104
Post Likes
2,365
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
No. Could I avoid being touched by the ball?

You could avoid being touched by the ball, by NOT being in an offside position :chin:
 

RobLev

Rugby Expert
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
2,170
Post Likes
244
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
You could avoid being touched by the ball, by NOT being in an offside position :chin:

I'm assuming that the ball has been kicked to Talbazar over my head - a fair assumption given his disclaimer of any skill in returning fire - which is why I'm retreating. But were you correct, then Law 11.6(a) could never apply.
 
Top