Cleaning some eye boogers

Jarrod Burton


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
725
Post Likes
208
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
That's the best description I've heard for the attached image. Haven't seen the full replay, but this happened a couple of minutes after Schoeman came back on after a forearm to the head of Simmons.
IMG_3965.jpg
Footage looks less incriminating, but given the couple of strikes to the head/neck area which saw the yellow card issued, surely we are going to see a suspension come out of these couple of interactions.

I know most of you can't see foxsports aus, but here is a link to the two clips.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/super-rugby/ruben-schoeman-rob-simmons-eye-rake-video-super-rugby-waratahs-v-lions-highlights/news-story/459eb447236aad3a872ec94787a9e82d
 

Decorily

Coach/Referee
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
1,567
Post Likes
425
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
As you allude to...a still image is pretty much meaningless in this/most case!!

I can't see the video.
 

beckett50


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 31, 2004
Messages
2,514
Post Likes
224
Current Referee grade:
Level 6
Looks pretty damming
 

Jarrod Burton


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
725
Post Likes
208
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
A series of shots from another location - for those who can't see the video:
a1.JPG
a2.JPG
a3.JPG
a4.JPG
a5.JPG
a6.JPG
The last one is pretty incriminating, bent fingers, on the eyes & pulling back
 

Pinky


Referees in Scotland
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
1,521
Post Likes
192
For me that is contact with the eye area and RC.
 

didds

Resident Club Coach
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,067
Post Likes
1,797
Im not convinced that the last phot definitely shows eyes in the socket and pulling backwards - Im not even sure if de4finitely shows contact as opposed to a hand somewhere very close to the area.

Its s stupid situation to put oneself in if it IS innocent etc !!!
 

Pablo


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
1,413
Post Likes
112
Current Referee grade:
Level 6
Yes, that’s a red card. There’s absolutely no good reason for his hands to go there. Acts like this can do serious damage to people’s vision, and must be eradicated from the game.
 

Pedro

Getting to know the game
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
272
Post Likes
10
Current Referee grade:
Level 15 - 11
Watching the Actual footage, his hand does little more than brush across the face. It looks awful on still frames - but nowhere near as bad in the video footage- more like him bracing against the player, realising it’s his face and moving his hand quickly away...that’s not to say it wasn’t intentional, but nowhere near as bad as that still makes it look.
 

Pablo


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
1,413
Post Likes
112
Current Referee grade:
Level 6
Watching the Actual footage, his hand does little more than brush across the face. It looks awful on still frames - but nowhere near as bad in the video footage- more like him bracing against the player, realising it’s his face and moving his hand quickly away...that’s not to say it wasn’t intentional, but nowhere near as bad as that still makes it look.

Disagree. Contact may well be brief, but that doesn’t make it any less of an offence. It only takes a small scratch or pressure in the wrong place to permanently damage someone’s sight. Red is responsible for the location of his own hands; intent is irrelevant.
 
Top