As for Ian's comment - I took it as provocatively humorous. I don't see your response in the same light.
On the other hand, you may say you don't care about my opinion on the matter. Fair enough.
Of course Roblev, feel free to scribe your comment then merely invite me to ignore as often as you llike, that's cute, thanks anyway dear chap.:biggrin:
One mans 'research library' is sometimes re-labelled anothers 'troll' resource, seemingly dependant on the preference of the journalist angle, hmmnn, interesting.
In the case of the post I commented about, the post invited a response did it not?? if a response wasnt sought ( then why would anyone otherwise regurgitate a relatively recent forum topic???? the subject that hadnt been previously mentioned in this thread) , strange really , but then I'm not able to close down threads that head in a direction that i dont agree with & neither, I suspect, can you.:shrug:
Humour, oh yes, that is something that is personal to both deliverer & listener, my humour bone recognises both, but again thanks clarifying that ours don't align exactly.
But just so that we're clear, no one has ever disputed the 'bursary pursuit' of young PI players, crikey some French clubs are still at it ! as did one famous English Club 7/8 years ago! , I merely pointed out the clear difference between that activity and the (controversial at the time) selection of PrincyBoy & I believe that the 'poaching insulation' was inaccurate as suggested by the earlier poster, albeit with a nice grinny face thingy alongside, & I merely said so.
Anyway, any current rugby Law discussion going on? :biggrin: