- Joined
- Jan 27, 2004
- Messages
- 9,486
- Post Likes
- 1,630
Good question.
I think some coaches do, others don't.
There is a dependency on the coach in some of the smaller/weaker teams. Almost to the point of blindness - run this play here, that one there. And the players do it even when they can see a better play in front of them.
I was at a coaching session last night helping out. What I liked about that session was the fact that the coach gave them a series of options that they can execute within a general philosophy of the game, and trusted them to make the right decision. He was also open to player feedback and suggestions which is something a lot of coaches aren't.
As I may have referenced before, though: the absence of coaching basics under pressure.
What will hold USA Rugby back won't be the quality of athletes, or pace or power. It will be game appreciation and execution of basics.
I think some coaches do, others don't.
There is a dependency on the coach in some of the smaller/weaker teams. Almost to the point of blindness - run this play here, that one there. And the players do it even when they can see a better play in front of them.
I was at a coaching session last night helping out. What I liked about that session was the fact that the coach gave them a series of options that they can execute within a general philosophy of the game, and trusted them to make the right decision. He was also open to player feedback and suggestions which is something a lot of coaches aren't.
As I may have referenced before, though: the absence of coaching basics under pressure.
What will hold USA Rugby back won't be the quality of athletes, or pace or power. It will be game appreciation and execution of basics.