Level 8 league match.
Approximately thirty minutes into the match, home team second row damages shoulder attempting a tackle. After quite a long period of attention, match resumes. However, on four further occasions, physio is on the pitch attending this player for this injury, for increasingly longer periods of time.
Eventually, with the score standing at 5 - 3 and nine minutes left on the clock, down he goes again for the sixth time following an innocuous colision. This time, I inform his skipper that his match is over and that he be replaced. Skipper asks the player who confirms that he will play on. The physio states that in her opinion, player can play on. I turn to skipper and state that this is not a matter for debate, his match is over, he can be substituted or sent off. Player is substituted, match finishes 13 - 3 with a length of the field try in the closing seconds.
In the bar, I had a very mixed reception. The majority, including the second team's referee, thought that I had overstepped my responsibility but a surprising number agreed with my decision. Visiting skipper thought that his opposite number should have replaced the player long before - 'we all have to go to work on Monday!'
So, does a referee have the authority to force the removal of a player through injury other than in a case of concussion?
NM
Approximately thirty minutes into the match, home team second row damages shoulder attempting a tackle. After quite a long period of attention, match resumes. However, on four further occasions, physio is on the pitch attending this player for this injury, for increasingly longer periods of time.
Eventually, with the score standing at 5 - 3 and nine minutes left on the clock, down he goes again for the sixth time following an innocuous colision. This time, I inform his skipper that his match is over and that he be replaced. Skipper asks the player who confirms that he will play on. The physio states that in her opinion, player can play on. I turn to skipper and state that this is not a matter for debate, his match is over, he can be substituted or sent off. Player is substituted, match finishes 13 - 3 with a length of the field try in the closing seconds.
In the bar, I had a very mixed reception. The majority, including the second team's referee, thought that I had overstepped my responsibility but a surprising number agreed with my decision. Visiting skipper thought that his opposite number should have replaced the player long before - 'we all have to go to work on Monday!'
So, does a referee have the authority to force the removal of a player through injury other than in a case of concussion?
NM