[Tackle] New tackle laws

Zebra1922


Referees in Scotland
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
717
Post Likes
233
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
This appears to have very little impact at the grass roots level. They are looking at a retrospective punishment following confirmation of a concussion, and presumably this will need video evidence of the tackler as well. I'm not sure this is really a new 'tackle law', more a new disciplinary sanction in the event of concussion.

Rugby could go down the route of NFL in making poor tackle technique an offence, but the differences are clearly less padding and therefore more onus in rugby to use proper technique, with poor technique more a result of a genuine error or the speed of the game rather than any attempt to injure opponents (as was the case on occasion in the NFL).
 

Flish


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
1,529
Post Likes
352
Location
Durham
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
Another reason to dodge a diagnosis of concussion at the top end, player welfare?
 

chbg


Referees in England
Joined
May 15, 2009
Messages
1,486
Solutions
1
Post Likes
445
Current Referee grade:
Level 7
This I find interesting:

"World Rugby rolled out a “nipple line” tackle trial during the Under-20s World Cup but referees found it near impossible to make split second decisions if a tackle was on the imaginary line or above."


If that is open knowledge, then players will continue to take the risk.
 

Taff


Referees in Wales
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
6,942
Post Likes
383
... In short, if the tackler gets concussed through poor technique, they’re liable for suspension.

Finally a sensible idea!
Good. I hope they extend it to players jumping on top of a player waiting to catch a ball as well.

... "World Rugby rolled out a “nipple line” tackle trial during the Under-20s World Cup but referees found it near impossible to make split second decisions if a tackle was on the imaginary line or above."

If that is open knowledge, then players will continue to take the risk.
My guess is that top end Refs will only want to see that the tackle is clearly below shoulder height and won't get stressed whether it is strictly at nipple height.
 
Last edited:

DocY


Referees in England
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Messages
1,809
Post Likes
421
This appears to have very little impact at the grass roots level.

I don't think that's a bad thing. IME it's a top level problem far more than grass roots.

I'm not sure this is really a new 'tackle law', more a new disciplinary sanction in the event of concussion.

Yep, you're quite right - the thread wasn't well named. But again, I don't think this is a bad thing. Most of the time these things are mistakes and I'm very much against cards for mistakes.
 

mcroker

Rugby Expert
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
362
Post Likes
113
Current Referee grade:
Level 10
This I find interesting:

"World Rugby rolled out a “nipple line” tackle trial during the Under-20s World Cup but referees found it near impossible to make split second decisions if a tackle was on the imaginary line or above."


If that is open knowledge, then players will continue to take the risk.

I have seen shirts in the junior game with a tackle line printed across the chest as part of the design - would seem like a good way to aid the ref. This law is one that they could introduce into age grade rugby to cause players to learn to get low from an early age
 

ChrisR

Player or Coach
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
3,231
Post Likes
356
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
There is still going to be a problem in judging impact height. Previously the arm over the shoulder was a clear cut tell.
 

Ian_Cook


Referees in New Zealand
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
13,680
Post Likes
1,760
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
This I find interesting:

"World Rugby rolled out a “nipple line” tackle trial during the Under-20s World Cup but referees found it near impossible to make split second decisions if a tackle was on the imaginary line or above."


If that is open knowledge, then players will continue to take the risk.


Then don't make it an imaginary line!!!

Make it an ACTUAL line, about one inch high, in a contrasting colour, running running across the chest at armpit height. This will achieve two things

1. Give the tackler an actual, visible line above which he must not make contact
2. Give the referee an actual, visible line which he can use to judge tackle height

This is not rocket science!
 

Elpablo73


Referees in England
Joined
May 16, 2016
Messages
75
Post Likes
22
Ian, will you please stop providing this type of response, good ideas like that are going to devalue the chats on this forum:sarc:
 

collybs


Referees in England
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
186
Post Likes
14
The shirts for the English Championship Cup willhave a line on them from armpit to armpit.
 
Last edited:

Phil E


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
16,094
Post Likes
2,356
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
Who is going to pay for all the grass roots clubs to have new shirts with a line on?
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,811
Post Likes
3,148
If they ever enforce that I am sure it would have a long grace period, so you would simply add the line when you next got new kit
 

Marc Wakeham


Referees in Wales
Joined
Jan 5, 2018
Messages
2,779
Post Likes
842
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Well it is not a new law It is part of the trial. Let's wait and see
 

Ian_Cook


Referees in New Zealand
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
13,680
Post Likes
1,760
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Who is going to pay for all the grass roots clubs to have new shirts with a line on?

Use tape initially, and phase them in as a design feature.
 
Top