Saracens vs Bristol - Next maul penalty will go...

[mcroker]

https://www.premiershiprugby.com/wa...v-bristol-bears-gallagher-premiership-round-6

At 39:49 (game clock) - Tom Foley says "3 maul penalties, next maul penalty will go"
At 40:23 - Is the next maul penalty, but advantage is played, and Sarecens score, as a result of which TF doesn't go back to award the YC...

Personally I would have done.

 

[didds]

and the oppo captain didnt provide a gentle reminder?

didds

 

[Balones]

My understanding is that our professional referees have agreed no ‘double whammy’ in such situations and as such no YC if a try is the outcome.

 

[dickell]

My understanding is that our professional referees have agreed no ‘double whammy’ in such situations and as such no YC if a try is the outcome.

We could ask who are making the laws.

And Barnsey gave a YC and a PT - is that not a double whammy (though correct IMO)?

 

[Marc Wakeham]

We could ask who are making the laws.

And Barnsey gave a YC and a PT - is that not a double whammy (though correct IMO)?

Indeed, double standards. We are there to interpret the laws not to make them up.

 

[beckett50]

My understanding is that our professional referees have agreed no ‘double whammy’ in such situations and as such no YC if a try is the outcome.

Perhaps this is the case is Wales & Pro14?