Last season I had an U17s match that ended 43-45 (or something like that) and there losing team thought they had won - it was a bit footballer-y with half the team crowding around me ("But sir...."). However, my running total method kept me straight and they accepted the result in good grace.
Why-Phil E, why not. Helps me later when drafting a thorough narrative report. In my area it's encouraged to be descriptive in post match reports. My memory doesn't keep those details as accurately as I'd like.
I also think teams will read up on opponent's ref reports to scout up coming matches. So&so's #10 scored 4 tries last game, good to know. Why my society encourages this, IDK.
Helps me later when drafting a thorough narrative report. In my area it's encouraged to be descriptive in post match reports.
Yeah, obviously it would need safeguards against such things.
I like Pegleg's phone app idea. I don't take my phone onto the pitch, but I have no need to. If I had a little app that could keep track of the score, time, cards (hey, could you get the phone to light up red or yellow?!), I probably would. And pray I didn't run out of battery.
The society here uses the electronic internet to assign matches and to be credited for refereeing a match one must submit a post-match report on the society's web page. Can be brief as the score but a descriptive narrative is encouraged. A questionnaire about the host club is also part of the reporting there online. I believe the club who gets the highest marks earns an award from the society and possibly a monetary prize. So that's part of it.I've never been asked to write a post match report?
Who asks you to write it and what's its purpose?
I need the times on the score as we are asked for current score in the YC and RC reports we make to the Union.
I wonder what difference it makes to a punch on the nose whether the score is 12-all or 40-zip.
Probably none for an individual incident, but if there was more than one it might help shed light on the tenor of the match. Overall there may be some statistical insights.I wonder what difference it makes to a punch on the nose whether the score is 12-all or 40-zip.
We are asked for it in case the act of foul play had a material effect on the outcome of the matchI wonder what difference it makes to a punch on the nose whether the score is 12-all or 40-zip.
We are asked for it in case the act of foul play had a material effect on the outcome of the match
I repeat my view that it may well be useful for statistical analysis rather than the individual incident.Odd. It seems to have no relevance to the issue. It would be interesting if someone knows the thinking behind it.