"use it" at scrums

Dickie E


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
14,154
Post Likes
2,165
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
http://www.rugbyonslaught.com/searc...:00+01:00&max-results=1&start=4&by-date=false

Thoughts on this?

For me ref called "use it" too early but, once he has done so, what are obligations on the team in possession? Does getting a shove on count as using it?

Law says:
[LAWS]Law 20.10
When a team has the ball at the #8’s feet but the scrum is not moving forward, the referee will call
“Use it!” The team must use the ball immediately (turnover scrum). [/LAWS]

It doesn't say SH or #8 must pick the ball up.
 

Paule23


Referees in Scotland
Joined
Oct 29, 2014
Messages
394
Post Likes
153
Current Referee grade:
Level 7
My interpretation is if the referee has said "use it" the option of getting a shove on has gone. The team either use the ball through a number 8 pick up or SH using it, or there is a scrum turnover.
 

Phil E


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
16,111
Post Likes
2,372
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
It was stationary for quite a few seconds and the ref told them to use it three times, the last time saying use it or lose it. They can't complain if they then lose it by doing nothing.

Yes they got a shove on, but it was hardly convincing, they maybe moved a foot at most.

I assume the referee was following a directive?
 

Rich_NL

Rugby Expert
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
1,621
Post Likes
499
I'd think most people implicitly understand "use it or lose it" to mean "end the phase, back to open play", as with rucks and mauls. Not "keep driving".

The first call was *very* early, though; the ball is still under the number 4's belly!
 

Rich_NL

Rugby Expert
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
1,621
Post Likes
499
Oops, #19 - the loosehead lock, in any case.
 

DocY


Referees in England
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Messages
1,809
Post Likes
421
I'm not sure if it's a WR directive, but certainly something I've been advised on: "use it" means "get it out of the scrum", supposedly to stop teams trying to milk penalties at the top level, or improve safety at lower levels.

Definitely made the first call too early, but realised what he'd done. "Use it or lose it" is pretty unambiguous.
 

merge

Getting to know the game
Joined
Feb 25, 2016
Messages
26
Post Likes
5
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
When the referee says "Use it 8" the ball is still under the second row, it's not until the final "Use it or lose it" that the ball is at the No 8s feet and he can unbind and pick it up. Would the referee be better talking to the scrum half who could legally pick up the ball, though probably under pressure?
 

menace


Referees in Australia
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
3,657
Post Likes
633
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
http://www.rugbyonslaught.com/searc...:00+01:00&max-results=1&start=4&by-date=false

Thoughts on this?

For me ref called "use it" too early but, once he has done so, what are obligations on the team in possession? Does getting a shove on count as using it?

Law says:
[LAWS]Law 20.10
When a team has the ball at the #8’s feet but the scrum is not moving forward, the referee will call
“Use it!” The team must use the ball immediately (turnover scrum). [/LAWS]

It doesn't say SH or #8 must pick the ball up.

Simple. Don't be dick and call 'use it' too early when the ball hasn't gone past the 2nd row.
 

Dickie E


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
14,154
Post Likes
2,165
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
I'm not sure if it's a WR directive, but certainly something I've been advised on: "use it" means "get it out of the scrum", supposedly to stop teams trying to milk penalties at the top level, or improve safety at lower levels.

But isn't it reasonable that getting a shove on after the "use it" meets both the letter and the intent of the law?
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,812
Post Likes
3,150
I thought "use it" means "phew, the scrum is still pretty much recognisable as a scrum, and the ball has reached somewhere near the back of it, so now FFS please get the ball away before something goes wrong, the scrum disintegrates and I am forced into yet another reset or, worse, forced pick a random PK out the hat, because I am buggered if I know what's happening"
 

DocY


Referees in England
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Messages
1,809
Post Likes
421
But isn't it reasonable that getting a shove on after the "use it" meets both the letter and the intent of the law?

I agree that it meets the letter of the law, but I'm not sure about the intent. I can believe the intent really is to get the ball out, though wouldn't be surprised if it was just to stop timewasting.

On a logistical point, though, getting a shove on immediately is not easy - certainly harder than picking the ball up. I think you'd really be running the risk of the ref deciding you've not used it immediately enough if you go for the shove.
 

OB..


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
22,981
Post Likes
1,838
I note that 20.10 (d) is in the 2016 law book, but not the 2015 one. I thought we were using the 2015 one for the current season?
 

thepercy


Referees in America
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Messages
923
Post Likes
147
Current Referee grade:
Level 1
I note that 20.10 (d) is in the 2016 law book, but not the 2015 one. I thought we were using the 2015 one for the current season?

No not in the southern or western hemispheres. But yes, you (Europe) are still using outdated laws.
 

TheBFG


Referees in England
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
4,392
Post Likes
237
Current Referee grade:
Level 6
I note that 20.10 (d) is in the 2016 law book, but not the 2015 one. I thought we were using the 2015 one for the current season?

Goes "live" on 1st July for NH
 

Camquin

Rugby Expert
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
1,653
Post Likes
310
I cannot find a definition for "use".
As ever the lack of a good editor shows
 

The Fat


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
4,204
Post Likes
496
I note that 20.10 (d) is in the 2016 law book, but not the 2015 one. I thought we were using the 2015 one for the current season?

Even though we are using the 2016 law book, what the ref did in the OP doesn't resemble 20.10(d) as his initial call was way too early.


20.10(d)
When a team has the ball at the number 8’s feet, and is trying to move forward but is not succeeding in doing so, the referee will call “use-it” once the ball has been at the number 8’s feet for a reasonable amount of time (3-5 seconds). The team must then use the ball immediately.




What he was trying to do was manage the situation to comply with this (below) which is a summary of WR Law changes for 2016. It is how the changes were communicated to referees in Australia and I suspect is probably similar to how they were communicated to the SANZAR refs. Note the significant differences open to interpretation between this and the actual wording in 20.10(d).

Law 20.10
When a team has the ball at the #8’s feet but the scrum is not moving forward, the referee will call
“Use it!” The team must use the ball immediately (turnover scrum).


In the OP, the ref does not follow either of these as his initial call is too early. His problem then is that he cannot take the words back and is basically forced to make the Brumbies use it. That means either the #8 or SH pick the ball up, not have the pack get another shove on.

What he should have done at the start of that scrum was to,
(a) get the scrum stable before the feed or
(b FK against Brumbies (dark blue) for early push
 

Chris_j


Referees in England
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
83
Post Likes
31
Current Referee grade:
Level 7
[LAWS] 20.10 (d) When a team has the ball at the number 8’s feet, and is trying to move forward but is not succeeding in doing so, the referee will call “use-it” once the ball has been at the number 8’s feet for a reasonable amount of time (3-5 seconds). The team must then use the ball immediately. [/LAWS]

So if it is at 8's feet and they are clearly not trying to move forward we should let them stay there for 5 minutes until time is up?

Do these law writers do it deliberately?

I hope we get clear guidance in the NH before the start of next season.
 

Dickie E


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
14,154
Post Likes
2,165
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
I agree that it meets the letter of the law, but I'm not sure about the intent. I can believe the intent really is to get the ball out, though wouldn't be surprised if it was just to stop timewasting.

The latter. It was introduced to stop a team winding down the clock at a ruck then brought across to apply to scrums too. The law makers don't care what a team does with the ball as long as they are not cynically time wasting.
 

thepercy


Referees in America
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Messages
923
Post Likes
147
Current Referee grade:
Level 1
[LAWS] 20.10 (d) When a team has the ball at the number 8’s feet, and is trying to move forward but is not succeeding in doing so, the referee will call “use-it” once the ball has been at the number 8’s feet for a reasonable amount of time (3-5 seconds). The team must then use the ball immediately. [/LAWS]

So if it is at 8's feet and they are clearly not trying to move forward we should let them stay there for 5 minutes until time is up?

Do these law writers do it deliberately?

I hope we get clear guidance in the NH before the start of next season.

From USARugby GMG

If the scrum becomes stationary (for 3-5 seconds), and the ball is at the hindmost player’s feet. The referee should instruct the team to “USE IT”. They should play the ball immediately, otherwise award a turnover scrum.
 
Top