Bit of a local derby today; 2 good 2nds teams played overall in reasonably good spirit but with certainly no love lost between the 2 sides.
In the first half, a White player goes down (I didn't see what caused it) and is sitting up but I suspect he's had a knock to the head. He says "I'm fine. Can you just give me a few seconds Ref"? No problem. He then asks if he wanted to, could he go off for a few minutes and come back on? They didn't have any subs. I said that was OK. I'm not sure that was the correct thing to do in law, but it felt right. As it happened he didn't go off and finished the game.
In the second half, a Yellow player gets hurt at a tackle. At first I assumed it was cramp, but the coach shook his head and just points to his calf. To be honest, I couldn't see anything wrong with his calf, but he was obviously in a pretty bad way and had to be carried off in agony. Amazingly, about 10 minutes later he wants to come back on. I didn't let him - as far as I was concerned he had gone off injured - and players who have gone off injured can't come back on. I admit I hadn't asked the coach if he was going off injured, I just assumed it because he was being carried off with an ice pack strapped to his leg.
While I was explaining why he couldn't come back on, he said "You were happy with their player coming back on earlier. What's the bloody difference?"
I'm happy that Yellow couldn't come back on, but the thing is, was I right to tell the White player he could go off for a few minutes if he wanted to? If he had gone off to clear his head, wasn't he effectively going off injured as well? I think my logic was that where head injuries are concerned, if he wanted a break, he could have it. :chin:
In the first half, a White player goes down (I didn't see what caused it) and is sitting up but I suspect he's had a knock to the head. He says "I'm fine. Can you just give me a few seconds Ref"? No problem. He then asks if he wanted to, could he go off for a few minutes and come back on? They didn't have any subs. I said that was OK. I'm not sure that was the correct thing to do in law, but it felt right. As it happened he didn't go off and finished the game.
In the second half, a Yellow player gets hurt at a tackle. At first I assumed it was cramp, but the coach shook his head and just points to his calf. To be honest, I couldn't see anything wrong with his calf, but he was obviously in a pretty bad way and had to be carried off in agony. Amazingly, about 10 minutes later he wants to come back on. I didn't let him - as far as I was concerned he had gone off injured - and players who have gone off injured can't come back on. I admit I hadn't asked the coach if he was going off injured, I just assumed it because he was being carried off with an ice pack strapped to his leg.
While I was explaining why he couldn't come back on, he said "You were happy with their player coming back on earlier. What's the bloody difference?"
I'm happy that Yellow couldn't come back on, but the thing is, was I right to tell the White player he could go off for a few minutes if he wanted to? If he had gone off to clear his head, wasn't he effectively going off injured as well? I think my logic was that where head injuries are concerned, if he wanted a break, he could have it. :chin:
Last edited: