When did RU outlaw the shoulder charge

ckuxmann


Referees in America
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
1,327
Post Likes
5
When was the shoulder charge outlawed in Rugby Union? Was it ever legal?

Watching 01 lions tour and just had it popped into my head.


Thanks
Cody
 

Davet

Referee Advisor / Assessor
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,731
Post Likes
4
Two players running for a ball may use their shoulders to compete.
 

ckuxmann


Referees in America
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
1,327
Post Likes
5
When I say shoulder charge I mean old rugby league style tackle.
 

OB..


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
22,981
Post Likes
1,838
When was the shoulder charge outlawed in Rugby Union? Was it ever legal?
Not an easy question to answer.

Since the start (1871) a legal tackle has required use of the arms to hold a player, but that does not in itself make a shoulder charge illegal - that would come under foul play, and can be expressed in a variety of ways.
[LAWS]1892
Free kicks by way of penalties [ie the modern PK] shall be awarded on claims by the opposite side if any player:
illegally tackles, charges, or obstructs an opponent [...][/LAWS]

Basically it has always been illegal if the refere regarded it as dangerous.
 

OB..


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
22,981
Post Likes
1,838
The tackle has always involved holding a player.

The specific offence of the "no arms tackle" dates from 1989/90[LAWS]The following actions constitute prima facie dangerous play:-
(a) If a player charges or knocks down an opponent carrying the ball without any attempt to grasp him (as in a tackle);
[..][/LAWS]
 

ChrisR

Player or Coach
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
3,231
Post Likes
356
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
Note that the word is "grasp", not "wrap". Big difference.

- - - Updated - - -

Note that the word is "grasp", not "wrap". Big difference.
 

OB..


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
22,981
Post Likes
1,838
Note that the word is "grasp", not "wrap". Big difference.

"Attempt to grasp ... (as in a tackle)". The tackle law said the player had to be "held". Would you not regard wrapping as an attempt to grasp? Let's not get overly pedantic.
 

ChrisR

Player or Coach
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
3,231
Post Likes
356
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
OB - Not pedantic. "Wrap" implies both arms around. "Grasp" can be a single hand.
 

OB..


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
22,981
Post Likes
1,838
OB - Not pedantic. "Wrap" implies both arms around. "Grasp" can be a single hand.
The question was about banning the shoulder charge.

I can "wrap" one arm round the shoulders of my granddaughter.

I don't see this as getting us anywhere.
 

ChrisR

Player or Coach
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
3,231
Post Likes
356
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
Jus' sayin', OB.

My point is that I always hear references to "wrap" or "not wrapping" and the physical act of wrapping is very different from "grasping".

Because this has become the common term (incorrectly) then the requirement to "wrap" (rather than grasp) has led to poor officiating in my experience.

That is why it matters and I'm surprised that you, of all people, think it pedantic.
 

Phil E


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
16,103
Post Likes
2,362
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
As a coach how do you teach people to tackle?
The RFU approved teaching technique is cheek to cheek, band of steel, wrapping the arms round.
AFAIAA the RFU tackling technique doesn't mention grasping.

I think you are just playing with words to try and prove a point. We all know what it means.
 

OB..


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
22,981
Post Likes
1,838
I'm surprised that you, of all people, think it pedantic.
I thought I had said many times that scrying the entrails of the words is not the best way to determine what a law means.
 

Browner

Banned
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
6,000
Post Likes
270
I thought I had said many times that scrying the entrails of the words is not the best way to determine what a law means.

Marauder, tut tut, starting to debate words with OB .... when will these youngsters learn !
 

ChrisR

Player or Coach
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
3,231
Post Likes
356
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
Tut, tut yourself. I'm not debating words, I'm pointing out that because of the common use of "wrap" I'm concerned that some referees, (nobody on this site, of course) believe that a full wrap is required by law.

Phil, if "We all know what it means." then I'm happy to stop making my point. And yes, I coach "wrap" but then my kids aren't refereeing the game.

PS. Browner, OB & I are about the same vintage.

OB, is "scrying" a real word? Or are you having me on. I don't profess to be a wordsmith.
 

Browner

Banned
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
6,000
Post Likes
270
my wit seems to have zipped straight over your head ...OB never concedes, he reconfigures the discussion .....or have you not learned that yet tut tut
 
Top