The Rugby Club & Bryce Lawrence's Scrums

Davet

Referee Advisor / Assessor
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,731
Post Likes
4
Red for home Green for away, or maybe Yellow for away since RG colour blindness is relatively widespread. Sound good, them you know for sure whose sneaky hand is in there. :)
 

OB..


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
22,981
Post Likes
1,838
If they are going to wear mitts, then velcro patches are the obvious (daft) answer.
 

Mike Whittaker


Referees in England
Joined
Mar 5, 2005
Messages
1,778
Post Likes
2
Whilst on the serious subject of colour in kit - what about these scrum caps etc?? There doesn't appear to be any control!!

Clearly they should all be predominantly (>80%) the main colour of the rest of the kit.

Next we will address the colour of all this tape on the legs...
 

Mike Whittaker


Referees in England
Joined
Mar 5, 2005
Messages
1,778
Post Likes
2
If they are going to wear mitts, then velcro patches are the obvious (daft) answer.

OB, you again show your awareness and understanding! Presumably the velcro will be of the same colour as the mitt that should be placed on it? Props may need that sort of guidance judging by their current inability to put there hands in the right place ;)
 

andyscott


Referees in England
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
3,117
Post Likes
55
Get the bind right, put it in straight, hold the push. Standard fare for pre match brief. We might even have a decent contest at scrum time!
Jumpers for goalposts etc.:deadhorse::chin:

Now thats fine, what if on the hit, we go straight to ground without getting a bind, who do you ping?
 

Ian_Cook


Referees in New Zealand
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
13,680
Post Likes
1,760
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Wendyball teams seem to have no problem with an odd neutral coloured shirt for the goal-keeper.

Hockey teams (Field and Ice) have no issue with special outfits for the goal-keeper.

Cricket teams have no problem with special gloves (two types) and special pads for the wicket-keeper.

I don't see it as an issue. A Club is required to have available specialist props jerseys (just as they require STE Props) or the game starts with uncontested scrums.
 

bignij


Referees in England
Joined
Aug 30, 2010
Messages
184
Post Likes
0
Now thats fine, what if on the hit, we go straight to ground without getting a bind, who do you ping?
If there's no definitive miscreant, then no-one. Reset and watch a bit closer.
I fear you may have missed my very heavy dose of irony. :)
 

didds

Resident Club Coach
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,068
Post Likes
1,798
Didds, you have this exact same problem anyway, props sharing shirts are different sizes now, what difference will it make?

I had thought there was a problem with numbered shirts... but you're right Dave now I've thought aboput it a bit longer!

didds
 

AiseaT39


Referees in America
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
56
Post Likes
0
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
The referees have been going after the weaker scrums with penalties and extra attention. They only correct half of the time!!

The so called stronger scrum will milk the penalty everytime since the referee will blame the weak one!
 

Mike Whittaker


Referees in England
Joined
Mar 5, 2005
Messages
1,778
Post Likes
2
At grass roots level it is much easier to ping the stronger pack. "Keep it up and hold it steady or we go uncontested - and you loose the advantage!"

In other words you put the decision making in the hands of the side which is capable of controlling the scrum - and if they make the right decision, fine.
 

AiseaT39


Referees in America
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
56
Post Likes
0
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
I remember an England vs Australia match during the Aussie European tour when the English LHP binds and pull down on the Aussie THP which collapsed that side of the scrum. Aussie gets penalised all the time. I wonder what the referee & the assistants were looking at?
 

Ian_Cook


Referees in New Zealand
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
13,680
Post Likes
1,760
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
At grass roots level it is much easier to ping the stronger pack. "Keep it up and hold it steady or we go uncontested - and you loose the advantage!"

In other words you put the decision making in the hands of the side which is capable of controlling the scrum - and if they make the right decision, fine.


A great solution at grass roots level Mike, but at the international level, you would immediately become the Wallabies' best friend :biggrin:
 

Mike Whittaker


Referees in England
Joined
Mar 5, 2005
Messages
1,778
Post Likes
2
I remember an England vs Australia match during the Aussie European tour when the English LHP binds and pull down on the Aussie THP which collapsed that side of the scrum. Aussie gets penalised all the time. I wonder what the referee & the assistants were looking at?

The THP boring in, of course ;)
 

Ian_Cook


Referees in New Zealand
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
13,680
Post Likes
1,760
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
I remember an England vs Australia match during the Aussie European tour when the English LHP binds and pull down on the Aussie THP which collapsed that side of the scrum. Aussie gets penalised all the time. I wonder what the referee & the assistants were looking at?

If its the match I am thinking of, either Alain Rolland or Joel Jutge was the referee, and Al Baxter was the THP who was, together with George Gregan, getting up to their usual tricks of trying to avoid scrummaging if at all possible. If the Wallabies did "win" the hit, as soon as the pressure came on, Baxter would head for the deck, gambling that the referee would not PK and simply reset. If so, mission accomplished, then they would put the reset scrum down and get the ball in and out as quickly as they could.

Paul Ackford once said something like "Australia's worst nightmare is a referee who keeps them on their feet in the scrum and makes them participate in a proper contest". Rolland is one of those referees.
 

Dixie


Referees in England
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
12,773
Post Likes
338
The referees have been going after the weaker scrums with penalties and extra attention. They only correct half of the time!!

The so called stronger scrum will milk the penalty everytime since the referee will blame the weak one!
I agree. Solution? RL scrums, perhaps?
 

damo


Referees in New Zealand
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
1,692
Post Likes
276
We need to keep the contest in the scrums, otherwise we will see 15 players all of the same body type, ala rugby league, and this would be a huge shame.

I wonder if at the elite level down to say senior club rugby there needs to be specialised TH and LH jerseys that are loosefitting and have a clearly seen spot on them for their opposing number to grab. If this were done, the ref would have no excuse for binding in the wrong place, he could simply see if the binding was on the spot or not.
 

Mike Whittaker


Referees in England
Joined
Mar 5, 2005
Messages
1,778
Post Likes
2
We need to keep the contest in the scrums, otherwise we will see 15 players all of the same body type, ala rugby league, and this would be a huge shame.

I wonder if at the elite level down to say senior club rugby there needs to be specialised TH and LH jerseys that are loosefitting and have a clearly seen spot on them for their opposing number to grab. If this were done, the ref would have no excuse for binding in the wrong place, he could simply see if the binding was on the spot or not.

Do you really think that the referees at the elite level need to have the props with clear spots marked on their jerseys to tell them whether the bind is in the right place or not? Mind you, they do seem to have difficulty so perhaps...
 

Bury_Dave


Referees in England
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Messages
56
Post Likes
0
I think the problem there is .. define "loose"... we can bandy about what we mean by loose, and probably agree. But the requirement needs to be defined well enough so that a shirt is ALWAYS Ok, niot open to interpretation on a weekly basis, and consider the fcat that club owned shirts may have to "fit" differently shaped props from week to week.
didds

Sorry, but that attitude of finding excuses NOT to put right something that we pretty much all agree is spoiling the game seems poppycock to me.

There are plenty of things for which the ref' is sole judge of fact and law and some wording that permits him to be able to grab a shirt or see a pre-match test scrum to ensure that shirts are grabbable (?) might sort that out. Surely the current set-up is killing what was once a thrilling part of the game ? I think that if some clubs need several shirts in order to be able to have a proper scrum, that's a small price to pay to get something off track back on track.

It may be something starting to happen in our levels of rugby but is only a serious problem in the rareified national and international levels where shirts are provided by sponsors anyways. At lower levels, clubs would soon learn to adapt and comply if it were dealt with every time it might become an issue.
 
Last edited:

didds

Resident Club Coach
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,068
Post Likes
1,798
Sorry, but that attitude of finding excuses NOT to put right something that we pretty much all agree is spoiling the game seems poppycock to me.

I don't disgree generally speaking. But I would add regarding these shirts suggestions... it just seems to me that its a desperate attempt to "fix" something by introducing MORE laws/requirements especially wher it introduces even MORE cost to teams. Quite why the average level 8 team would want shiny shirts defeats me - they'd be better off spending the money on giving every player a ball to take home and actually get used to passing properly!

didds
 

Davet

Referee Advisor / Assessor
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,731
Post Likes
4
Didds

I thought we'd agreed that the shirt cost would not rise, you need shirts to fit all players, you still need shirts to fit all players.

You are absolutely right, though - buying tight shiny shirts in the first place is not money well spent in terms of opportunity cost.
 
Top