well if a punch to the head from behind is not a red every single time then i see no way forward for the game.
diids
I 100% agree
Of course, it has to actually be a punch or a strike to the head in the first place
The only view that clearly shows both Black 2's right hand/arm and the right side of Red 4's head is from the leading sideline camera.
It shows a different story completely.
Now, if I was defending him at the judiciary hearing, I would be taking this in as part of his evidence.
I would be claiming that my client was attempting to pull the obstructing player out of his way and that he made no contact with his head, and the fact it remained square on his shoulders and was not pushed to the left (as it would have been had a swinging arm made contact with it) is clear evidence of that.
I would further claim that the opposing player's injury occurred when my client's right thigh struck his head when they both went to ground, not by any supposed contact my client's hand or arm made with his head.
***
Now that may not be what happened at all, and there could very well have been contact with the head, but it is far from being as conclusive as some of you are making out.
EDIT: Interestingly, the next replay (the one that is shown immediately after the one I captured the stills from) is from a sideline camera slightly further behind the two players. It definitely shows Hore's thigh striking Red 4's head as the go to ground.
I would not be surprised it he wasn't cited, but equally, I would not be surprised if he was. I would also not object to either outcome.