Rich_NL
Rugby Expert
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2015
- Messages
- 1,621
- Post Likes
- 499
Apologies if this is a well-worn discussion, but I can't find much using the search function here.
Everyone knows ankle tap tackles, but... what status do they have?
I presume that they're not tackles - no-one is held - so it's just treated as the ball-carrier falling; they can pass, release or pick up the ball and continue on their way if they can, and the 'tackler' also has no obligations. Should we just ref it as an "assisted stumble" in open play?
[LAWS]10.4(d) [FONT=fs_blakeregular]Tripping. [/FONT][FONT=fs_blakeregular]A player must not trip an opponent with the leg or foot. [/FONT][/LAWS] specifies with a leg or foot as a dangerous tackle, and I'm pretty sure there'd be riot if any ref blew for a normal tap tackle - but why is a sliding foot hook worse than a leaping hand trip (more difficult in a normal game, of course, but that's irrelevant)? Just because of more likelihood of colliding and spraining an ankle? Or to discourage boots-first play?
Everyone knows ankle tap tackles, but... what status do they have?
I presume that they're not tackles - no-one is held - so it's just treated as the ball-carrier falling; they can pass, release or pick up the ball and continue on their way if they can, and the 'tackler' also has no obligations. Should we just ref it as an "assisted stumble" in open play?
[LAWS]10.4(d) [FONT=fs_blakeregular]Tripping. [/FONT][FONT=fs_blakeregular]A player must not trip an opponent with the leg or foot. [/FONT][/LAWS] specifies with a leg or foot as a dangerous tackle, and I'm pretty sure there'd be riot if any ref blew for a normal tap tackle - but why is a sliding foot hook worse than a leaping hand trip (more difficult in a normal game, of course, but that's irrelevant)? Just because of more likelihood of colliding and spraining an ankle? Or to discourage boots-first play?