Feet or Hands?

Iron_Lung


Referees in America
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
256
Post Likes
21
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
I've noticed a lot of players starting to get ready in close to the ruck in a similar position to a sprinter or NFL lineman. Crouched down with a hand on the deck, ready to charge at the attacking player, particularly a forward in close.

Law 16.5, Offside at the Ruck, states "If a player who is behind the offside line oversteps it and does not join the ruck the player is offside."

By stating that it's the overstep that causes the offside, my interpretation was that it was just both feet behind the last feet of the ruck in order to be onside. However I've had a few people indicate that all body parts on the ground (ie including the hands) have to be behind the line.

Thoughts?
 

Toby Warren


Referees in England
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
3,431
Post Likes
57
I personally keep all of their body behind the back foot. Otherwise a player who had their feet behind the line, but are crouched could be 1m or more closer to the attackers.
 

Dixie


Referees in England
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
12,773
Post Likes
338
If any part of the person touches the ground ahead of the offside line, he's offside
 

andyscott


Referees in England
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
3,117
Post Likes
55
Just manage it, if you want them back get them back, you set your standards.
 

Simon Thomas


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Messages
12,848
Post Likes
189
I prefer to see them managed to have all irbody behind the back foot - "push back please", "behind the back foot please", "check your offside line please"
 

ckuxmann


Referees in America
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
1,327
Post Likes
5
This happened in the Scotland Wales game if I'm not mistaking.
 
Top