Law Amendment Trials

PeterH


Referees in England
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
709
Post Likes
0
IRB Council Approved

Law Amendment Trials

The following Law amendments have been approved for global trial by IRB Council.
The implementation dates are the start of the next Northern Hemisphere season at,
or around, September 1, 2012, and the start of the next Southern Hemisphere
season at, or around, January 1, 2013. It is not intended that a Member Union
should implement the trial Law amendments mid season or mid competition.
Member Unions will be given the opportunity to provide both quantitative and
qualitative feedback on the trials. Unions will be requested to comment on the Law
Trials at a future date. The process for providing feedback will be outlined in the near
future.

1. Law 3.4 Players Nominated as Substitute

For international matches a Union may nominate up to seven
replacements/substitutes.

Amend Law 3.4 to read:

For international matches a Union may nominate up to eight
replacements/substitutes.

Please note - Law 3.4 trial is for application from the November window
international matches.

2. Law 4 Players Clothing – Provisions Permitting the Use of GPS

IRB Council confirmed that the current provisions relating to Unions’
dispensation for the use of GPS equipment will continue. Details can be
obtained from the IRB Technical Services Department.

3. Law 4.2 Special Additional Items of clothing for women

Current Law 4.2 to become 4.2 (a).

Female players may wear cotton blend long tights with single inside leg seam
under their shorts and socks.

The sole configuration below was approved for trial:

(Boot picture in next post goes here)

Save for the above configuration, studs must be compliant with Law 4
and IRB Specifications (Regulation 12).

5. Law 6.A.6 (b) Referee Consulting with Others

IRB Council approved trials which will extend the powers of the TMO. The
trials will take place in selected competitions. Protocols will be circulated at a
later date.

6. Law 9.B.1 Taking a Conversion Kick

The kicker must take the kick within one minute from the time the kicker has
indicated an intention to kick. The intention to kick is signalled by the arrival of
the kicking tee or sand, or the player makes a mark on the ground. The player
must complete the kick within one minute even if the ball rolls over and has to
be placed again.

Amend 9.B.1 (e) to read:

The kick must be taken within one minute and thirty seconds (ninety seconds)
of a try being scored, even if the ball rolls over and is placed again.

7. Law 12 1 Outcome of a Knock-On or Throw Forward

Knock-on or throw forward into to touch. When the ball goes into touch
from a knock-on or throw forward, the non-offending team will be offered the
choice of a lineout at the point the ball crossed the touch line, or a scrum at
the place of the knock-on or throw forward. The non-offending team may
exercise this option by taking a quick throw-in.

Current Law 12.1 (e) becomes 12.1 (f).

8. Law 16.7 Unsuccessful End to a Ruck

When the ball has been clearly won by a team at a ruck and the ball is
available to be played the referee will call "use it" after which the ball must be
played within five seconds. If the ball is not played within the five seconds the
referee will award a scrum and the team not in possession of the ball at the
ruck is awarded the throw-in.

For a quick throw-in, the player may be anywhere outside the field of play
between the place where the ball went into touch and the player’s goal line.

Amend 19.2 (b) to read:

For a quick throw-in, the player may be anywhere outside the field of play
between the line of touch and the player’s goal line.

(Quick Throw picture from next post goes here)

Line of Touch

10. Law 20.1 (g) Forming a Scrum

The referee will call “crouch” then “touch”. The front rows crouch and using
their outside arm each prop touches the point of the opposing props outside
shoulder. The props then withdraw their arms. The referee will then call
“pause”. Following a pause the referee will then call “engage”. The front rows
may then engage. The “engage” call is not a command but an indication that
the front rows may come together when ready.

Amend 20.1 (g) to read:

The referee will call “crouch” then “touch”. The front rows crouch and using
their outside arm each prop touches the point of the opposing prop’s outside
shoulder. The props then withdraw their arms. The referee will then call “set”
when the front rows are ready. The front rows may then engage. The “set” call
is not a command but an indication that the front rows may come together
when ready.

11. 21.4 Penalty and Free Kick Options and Requirements

Lineout Alternative. A team awarded a penalty or a free kick at a lineout may
choose a further lineout, they throw-in. This is in addition to the scrum option.

Current 21.4 (b) to (k) become (c) to (l).

Sevens Variations - Effective June 1 2012

Amend Law 3.4 to read:

A team may nominate up to five replacements/substitutes.

A team may substitute or replace up to five players.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Phil E


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
16,094
Post Likes
2,356
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
Worth noting that this is an update to the email sent out by RGJ earlier this week.
The transcript with the IRB doc says.......

Email sent on behalf of Richard Glynne-Jones

Ladies and Gentlemen

Global Law Trials

Further to my e-mail earlier this week, please find attached more detailed correspondence from the IRB.

You will note that the IRB has also approved an amend to the way in which the scrum is to be engaged. Please accept my apologies for the incomplete information I provided you with originally.

Further guidance will be provided to match officials in due course.

Regards
Richard Glynne-Jones
Head of Referee Development

Couple of diagrams which Peter H missed off.

4.3 studs
View attachment 2098

19.2b Quick Throw
View attachment 2099
 
Last edited:

chbg


Referees in England
Joined
May 15, 2009
Messages
1,486
Solutions
1
Post Likes
445
Current Referee grade:
Level 7
"Female players may wear cotton blend long tights with single inside leg seam
under their shorts and socks.

The sole configuration below was approved for trial:"

And I thought that this would show the only type of tights and how they would be permitted to be worn :(
 

ChrisR

Player or Coach
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
3,231
Post Likes
356
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
If the ammendment becomes Law would you accept both boots, or just the one on the left?

two boots.JPG

Nice of them to leave the manufacturers logo on.
 

Taff


Referees in Wales
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
6,942
Post Likes
383
... Couple of diagrams which Peter H missed off.

19.2b Quick Throw
View attachment 2099
I was at a dinner recently and we started discussing these changes. When we started discussing the change with the QTI, one pretty experienced ref chirped up "What's changed? That's what it is now. I've always allowed that". :wow:
 
Last edited:

ChrisR

Player or Coach
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
3,231
Post Likes
356
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
Exactly, crossref! So why not put it in words: "Single stud at toe is OK"?
 

Davet

Referee Advisor / Assessor
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,731
Post Likes
4
The Law specifies just the Adidas one - on the left. Clearly it must show the Adidas logo as well to conform precisely to the configuration specified.....?
 

Pedro

Getting to know the game
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
272
Post Likes
10
Current Referee grade:
Level 15 - 11
Does that mean all players have to wear two left boots now?
 

Davet

Referee Advisor / Assessor
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,731
Post Likes
4
Save for the above configuration, studs must be compliant with Law 4
and IRB Specifications (Regulation 12).

Which clearly recognises that this specific configuration is NOT compliant with Law 4, and is an exception that must be made - everything else is as it was.
 

Chunky Charvis


Referees in England
Joined
Aug 18, 2009
Messages
236
Post Likes
3
Current Referee grade:
Elite Panel
Why was "Crouch Pause Set" not included in the memo given out last week? Why choose to add it in just a week later? Doesn't look very organised!

Also, can we get a campaign for all of this, very important stuff, to be posted by the iRB on their website?
It's one thing communicating (badly) to referees - who eventually get the message. It's quite another thing communicating (or failing completely to communicate) to the masses. The average punter or even regular watcher will not have a clue of these ELVs.
 

Phil E


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
16,094
Post Likes
2,356
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
Why was "Crouch Pause Set" not included in the memo given out last week? Why choose to add it in just a week later? Doesn't look very organised!

Also, can we get a campaign for all of this, very important stuff, to be posted by the iRB on their website?
It's one thing communicating (badly) to referees - who eventually get the message. It's quite another thing communicating (or failing completely to communicate) to the masses. The average punter or even regular watcher will not have a clue of these ELVs.


Crouch Touch, not Crouch Pause?


The IRB document has been sent to every Referees Society, Club, CCC, CRC and CB (in RFU land).
It is up to those people to disseminate downwards.

I will be dicsussing these at our first training meeting, to make sure that all of our referees in Warwickshire are aware and in unison.
 

dave_clark


Referees in England
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
4,647
Post Likes
104
Current Referee grade:
Level 15 - 11
Crouch Touch, not Crouch Pause?


The IRB document has been sent to every Referees Society, Club, CCC, CRC and CB (in RFU land).
It is up to those people to disseminate downwards.

I will be dicsussing these at our first training meeting, to make sure that all of our referees in Warwickshire are aware and in unison.

i haven't received it, and i'm listed on rugby first as our CRefC.
 

coonor


ELRA/Club Referee
Joined
Jul 21, 2011
Messages
77
Post Likes
0
Hi guys, I just wanted some clarification on what's different between the current QTI procedure and the new trial one? And what studs should we be allowing? I mean does the single front stud have to be on the outside etc?
 

Casey Bee


Referees in England
Joined
Feb 18, 2010
Messages
767
Post Likes
0
Hi guys, I just wanted some clarification on what's different between the current QTI procedure and the new trial one? And what studs should we be allowing? I mean does the single front stud have to be on the outside etc?

Previously the furthest up the pitch you could be (towards where player wants to score) was where the ball went out of play. Now it can be the 'line of touch'. If you imagine, a kick was put out on the full, just outside the 22m, then line of touch could be say 50m more advantageous than where ball went out of play. Trust that makes sense!

Re the studs, it looks to me that they are effectively saying a single toe stud boot design is now acceptable.
 

Phil E


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
16,094
Post Likes
2,356
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
Re the studs, it looks to me that they are effectively saying a single toe stud boot design is now acceptable.

No, they are definitely not saying that.

What they are saying is that the boot shown (which is an Adidias boot) is a single exception to the rule.

I wonder how much money Adidas might have "donated" to the IRB?
 

coonor


ELRA/Club Referee
Joined
Jul 21, 2011
Messages
77
Post Likes
0
Previously the furthest up the pitch you could be (towards where player wants to score) was where the ball went out of play. Now it can be the 'line of touch'. If you imagine, a kick was put out on the full, just outside the 22m, then line of touch could be say 50m more advantageous than where ball went out of play. Trust that makes sense!

Re the studs, it looks to me that they are effectively saying a single toe stud boot design is now acceptable.

Of course that makes sense now! Cheers

No, they are definitely not saying that.

What they are saying is that the boot shown (which is an Adidias boot) is a single exception to the rule.

I wonder how much money Adidas might have "donated" to the IRB?

So the boots shown in the attached image are exempt to the single front stud regulation?
 
Top