Looked wrong, but just checking - players coming through line out

Dan Cottrell

Getting to know the game
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
84
Post Likes
5
Wiley old second row sprints through the line-out as the opposition catcher (lifted) catches and passes to his scrum half. Must be offside - line-out hasn't finished until the ball as left the line of the line out...

Plus, the same team keen to employ "not engage" tactic to either force a penalty for obstruction OR have a player run round to grab the ball from the player at the back of the non-maul. Again, assume that the non-maul needs to move forward from the line-out before he can run round.
 

Dixie


Referees in England
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
12,773
Post Likes
338
Wiley old second row sprints through the line-out as the opposition catcher (lifted) catches and passes to his scrum half. Must be offside - line-out hasn't finished until the ball as left the line of the line out...
the old "Off the Top" catch'n'pass or te straight tap to the SH causes real problems, because the loose forwards (or ancient locks from time to time) can advance as soon as the ball has left the lineout. In the context of the tap off the top, when exactly does that happen? If it is your standard tactic, don't be surprised if the rearmost player is out of the blocks as soon as the tap takes place.

In that scenario, the ref is in a difficult position because watching a ball 12' off the ground to see when it passes beyond the outer shoulder of the jumpers (all of whom have stepping into the gap) pretty much makes it impossible at the same time to be watching the back man come out of the blocks - especially if you are also watching for interference with either the jumper or his supporters.

Given that, I have to wonder why coaches continue to employ the tactic rather than allow the jumper to come to ground. I guess the answer is to avoid the potential wrap preventing the quick release - but the cost of that tactic is that you risk marginal offsides not being called.

Plus, the same team keen to employ "not engage" tactic to either force a penalty for obstruction OR have a player run round to grab the ball from the player at the back of the non-maul. Again, assume that the non-maul needs to move forward from the line-out before he can run round.
Offside line in the lineout after the ball has been touched is the line of the ball . So yes, the lineout has to end before the non-engagers can go round the back. Of course, there is more than one way in which the lineout can end - but broadly it occurs when the ball or a player carrying it leaves the lineout. Personally, I'd take this to mean either that the ball has moved about 1m from the Line of Touch, or that the feet of all the pre-bound players has moved beyond the line of touch. Others may take a different view.
 

didds

Resident Club Coach
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,093
Post Likes
1,809
wrt coaches Dave I suspect it has more to do with how often their s/half actually gets smacked by oppo pouring thru the gaps. I find that as players get older they ensure the gaps in the lineout are less easy to find. Just having larger bodies probably does most of this!

didds
 

OB..


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
22,981
Post Likes
1,838
Offside line in the lineout after the ball has been touched is the line of the ball . So yes, the lineout has to end before the non-engagers can go round the back. Of course, there is more than one way in which the lineout can end - but broadly it occurs when the ball or a player carrying it leaves the lineout. Personally, I'd take this to mean either that the ball has moved about 1m from the Line of Touch,
Reasonable.
or that the feet of all the pre-bound players has moved beyond the line of touch. Others may take a different view.
I would not use that criterion because it relates to a ruck or maul, and we have neither.
 

Dixie


Referees in England
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
12,773
Post Likes
338
Reasonable. I would not use that criterion because it relates to a ruck or maul, and we have neither.
Indeed - which is why I recognised that others may differ. But if we DID have a ruck or maul, then the lineout would be over at this point, irrespective of the position of the ball; I can't really see that the addition of one player from the opposition changes much in that regard - but thoroughly accept your right to hold a different (and perfectly rational) view.
 

Dickie E


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
14,158
Post Likes
2,166
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
In that scenario, the ref is in a difficult position because watching a ball 12' off the ground to see when it passes beyond the outer shoulder of the jumpers (all of whom have stepping into the gap) pretty much makes it impossible at the same time to be watching the back man come out of the blocks - especially if you are also watching for interference with either the jumper or his supporters.

Easy. Stand in the zipper position like I do.
 

Davet

Referee Advisor / Assessor
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,731
Post Likes
4
Joel - don't stand in the zipper. You can see bugger all worth seeing, especially when the gap closes as they jump for the ball. And you've missed 2 Black getting ahead of the ball, because you can't see him.
 
Top