Personally, I have no problem with the assessment, if in someones opinion I missed, or misjudged an infringement which they felt the saw, I want to know. Especially if it changes the context of the match. The person who did this assessment I greatly respect, and is one of our countries great rugby minds. I have no issues with his report, especially with my needing to be slightly more strict with the technical stuff, early jumping in LO. Yes they did early jump, I told them to bring the person down, however, outside of that I did not address it. I was trying not to blow my whistle, and get flow, however, on one occassion it ended up hurting the throwing in side. The not straight miss, well that's an opinion one, I need to see the video.
I have more of an issue with the overall process we use. If a B2 referee and I refereed the same match, and got the same score, a B2 referee would get an above grade, B1 evaluation. Myself as a B3 would get a B2 evaluation. Slightly skewed. My feeling is if two refs go out and ref identical matches, and one is a B3 and one is a B2, well both should get a B1 eval.