NZ v England

Simon Thomas


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Messages
12,848
Post Likes
189
Clinical and slick, exploiting the England 14 men - well worked.
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,811
Post Likes
3,149
Can't help feeling the balance of the refereeing decisions made the difference here. Not Nigel best game.
 

Ian_Cook


Referees in New Zealand
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
13,680
Post Likes
1,760
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
We were very, very lucky to get away with this match
 

Toby Warren


Referees in England
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
3,431
Post Likes
57
NZ's experience and knowledge shaded it. Well played NZ.

Some calls to pick over.

I thought England 'held on' a lot and we're given a lot of time
Lots of contact in the air
The lack of YC for NZ was very odd
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,811
Post Likes
3,149
NZ were lucky to avoid 2 YC, ma nonu holding haskell back at the start and certainly the PK for tackler not releasing just a metre from own line.

2 very odd knock on decisions against England as well.

Small margins
 

Simon Thomas


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Messages
12,848
Post Likes
189
Don't blame Nigel. To beat NZ you have to be totally on your game and England made too many errors and in the second half seemed one-dimensional except for Morgan, Cipriani and Eastmond breaks.
England will have a lot of confidence for the next two tests with the Sarries and Northampton players now available.
Lancaster, Rowntree and Farrell will have seen a number of AB potential weaknesses they can look to exploit in the next two weeks.

My man of the match was Kiwi #9 - outstanding.

Just watched the try again - Robshaw and Mahler should have been the other way round as guards, or even Robshaw stood off totally as he was a double guard. That could have shut down the space Smith and Smith had to work in.
 
Last edited:

The Fat


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
4,204
Post Likes
496
NZ's experience and knowledge shaded it. Well played NZ.

Some calls to pick over.

I thought England 'held on' a lot and we're given a lot of time
Lots of contact in the air
The lack of YC for NZ was very odd

Was thinking the same thing.
Will watch the replay after the Wallabies v France test.
 

Dickie E


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
14,138
Post Likes
2,155
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
I've haven't seen so many handling errors since I watched the U9 blind school playing in a gale, at night, in pissing rain, with a bar of Lifebuoy for a ball. Both teams quite poor. Hopefully a harbinger for Sept 2015.
 
Last edited:

Ian_Cook


Referees in New Zealand
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
13,680
Post Likes
1,760
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Watch the slow mo replay. It looks like Yarde actually strips the ball as they are going down.
Game changer.

Not really. I thought the Black BC had knee on the ground so Yarde to he has to release the tackler

As for the no YC call near the England line, NO explained that to Fekitoa himself as they approached the restart.
 

dave_clark


Referees in England
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
4,647
Post Likes
104
Current Referee grade:
Level 15 - 11
missed that explanation - what did NO say?
 

Simon Thomas


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Messages
12,848
Post Likes
189
Great shot on Sky with Stuart Barnes giving his analysis and Freddie Burns sitting in t shirt on the pitch boots off chatting on his i-Phone
 

winchesterref


Referees in England
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
2,014
Post Likes
197
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
missed that explanation - what did NO say?

Told him that it was a timing issue. For an international player? He knew exactly what he was doing, I don't buy that it was timing, it was cynical in my view!
 

Ian_Cook


Referees in New Zealand
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
13,680
Post Likes
1,760
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
Fekitoa thought (incorrectly) that the ball was over the goal-line, so he didn't have to release. It was about a foot short
 

winchesterref


Referees in England
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
2,014
Post Likes
197
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
That's rubbish and you know it. On or above the line, or centimetres, but not knowing where he is by a foot?
 

damo


Referees in New Zealand
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
1,692
Post Likes
276
Fekitoa thought (incorrectly) that the ball was over the goal-line, so he didn't have to release. It was about a foot short
Hmmm. I thought Owens was saying that he understood that Fekitoa had thought a maul had been formed so he didn't have to release. That certainly makes more sense.
 

Browner

Banned
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
6,000
Post Likes
270
It doesn't matter what Fekitoa claimed to have thought, what matters is the neither the player on his back nor the player on his feet released the BC as so delayed Quick ball for England.

TBH I was expecting better from NO today, if he's usually 9/10 , today he was 6/10 regardless of the final try...... Which incidentally came from Mealamu's ( far to late arriving after the ruck was formed, to claim a jackling attempt) penalty con.

Today was useful for
A) crossing off Wilson who was awful with ball in hands
B) establishing Burns as a contender that a season at LTigers might fine tune
C) crossing off Young's ( box kicking aside)
D) giving the series a lift
E) removing current 'unbeatable tag' from nz, clearly they are.
F) giving NO a ego readjustment , his post match debrief will be uncomfortable for him


Most of the marginal stuff went against england IMO,
PS.... did he call England for no#s in the LO when AB won the throw unchallenged, or did I imagine that?
 
Last edited:

The Fat


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
4,204
Post Likes
496
Hmmm. I thought Owens was saying that he understood that Fekitoa had thought a maul had been formed so he didn't have to release. That certainly makes more sense.

The maul theory is the one I think Fekitoa was working under. He was holding the BC's upper body and ball up but the BC's legs and arse were on the ground.
FWIW, it doesn't matter what Fekitoa thought, if it was a tackle he had to release. Doesn't matter if he thought it was a maul or an elephant, if it slowed the attack that close to the line, then a card should have been considered.
 

Browner

Banned
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
6,000
Post Likes
270
Hmmm. I thought Owens was saying that he understood that Fekitoa had thought a maul had been formed so he didn't have to release. That certainly makes more sense.

Its what I would have been saying to avoid a YC if I was that player!
 

SimonSmith


Referees in Australia
Staff member
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
9,369
Post Likes
1,471
There's nothing quite as illuminating as England fans in defeat.

It wasn't the referee's fault.
 
Top