wayne and steve walsh are presenting (and q & a ) at london meet on thursday -any q's for the boys??
obvious one being if WB agrees that if he "had had the luxury of attending the disciplinary panel" and "replaying,reviewing,analysing and dissecting,with unlimited time" all the dvds in slomo he "may welll have come to a different conclusion" other than to penalise and yc ferris?
or indeed should he just have lreported yc as a 10.4 (e) offence (i.e. not a tip but dangerous enough to me to warrant a yc )
afterwards we are off for a curry where am sure there will be some stellas and full and frank discussion but unfortunately probably not for public record.
obvious one being if WB agrees that if he "had had the luxury of attending the disciplinary panel" and "replaying,reviewing,analysing and dissecting,with unlimited time" all the dvds in slomo he "may welll have come to a different conclusion" other than to penalise and yc ferris?
or indeed should he just have lreported yc as a 10.4 (e) offence (i.e. not a tip but dangerous enough to me to warrant a yc )
afterwards we are off for a curry where am sure there will be some stellas and full and frank discussion but unfortunately probably not for public record.