CrouchTPEngage
Referees in England
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 498
- Post Likes
- 58
- Current Referee grade:
- Level 8
I'm about to ref my first game with the new laws and have read the "guidance and priorities" emails.
I was taught to create a "mental model" in my mind of game situations : How and when, I would detect offences under 20.12(c) i.e. "This scrum-half may not move into the space between the flanker and No. 8 when following the ball through the scrum". But I'm struggling.
So I thought I'd try to simplify this to a pre-match briefing to No.9s to remind them to simply, "not go past the Flanker". But is this right ?
If the scrum wheels towards No.9 (who didnt put in ), Its going to be hard for him to NOT step past the flanker. ?
I guess the motivation behind the amendment was to allow scrums to complete "cleanly" and to stop opps No.9 from interfering with the ball ( and No. 8) as it emerges.
Anyone else had experience of this new amendment ? It certainly didn't appear to be policed in the Level 2 game I watched the other day ?
Any advice ? Ta
I was taught to create a "mental model" in my mind of game situations : How and when, I would detect offences under 20.12(c) i.e. "This scrum-half may not move into the space between the flanker and No. 8 when following the ball through the scrum". But I'm struggling.
So I thought I'd try to simplify this to a pre-match briefing to No.9s to remind them to simply, "not go past the Flanker". But is this right ?
If the scrum wheels towards No.9 (who didnt put in ), Its going to be hard for him to NOT step past the flanker. ?
I guess the motivation behind the amendment was to allow scrums to complete "cleanly" and to stop opps No.9 from interfering with the ball ( and No. 8) as it emerges.
Anyone else had experience of this new amendment ? It certainly didn't appear to be policed in the Level 2 game I watched the other day ?
Any advice ? Ta