CrouchTPEngage
Referees in England
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 498
- Post Likes
- 58
- Current Referee grade:
- Level 8
Can anyone point me to an updated F R logic tree.
I read a thread on here recently which concluded that , when a team loses a prop , due to card or injury, AND there is no suitable replacement the the referr must start using uncontested scrums. The other conclusion, was that there was also a "man off" law in which the offemding team must drop a player. I presume this is to deter teams from abusing the laws by using the uncontested option for tactical advarage ?
Idies anyone have a reference fire this please?
If i yelliw card a prop, and there is no replacement, do the offenders then need to go down to 13 players for 10 mins?
I read a thread on here recently which concluded that , when a team loses a prop , due to card or injury, AND there is no suitable replacement the the referr must start using uncontested scrums. The other conclusion, was that there was also a "man off" law in which the offemding team must drop a player. I presume this is to deter teams from abusing the laws by using the uncontested option for tactical advarage ?
Idies anyone have a reference fire this please?
If i yelliw card a prop, and there is no replacement, do the offenders then need to go down to 13 players for 10 mins?