What do you count as 'Cocked'?

Tibbs


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 10, 2006
Messages
136
Post Likes
0
Had an interesting one on Staurday. Red Hooker would take the ball in both hands and bring the ball up and rest it on his head, pause for a bit, and then bring the ball all the way back and throw it in.

I thought that this was a ploy to bring the oppo jumpers up early, and it did, so I told him not to do it. Speaking to him afterwards he said that no other referee had told him not to.

What do you guys think?

Chris
 

Robert Burns

, Referees in Canada, RugbyRefs.com Webmaster
Staff member
Joined
Nov 10, 2003
Messages
9,650
Post Likes
7
I don't see a problem providing he isn't making it look like he's about to throw, 'cocked' in my mind is when he takes it back behind his head to throw, then he should not delay.
 

Simon Griffiths


Referees in England
Joined
Oct 20, 2004
Messages
1,914
Post Likes
0
I'd go with Robert on this. I'd say cocked is when it's fully back in the position to be thrown from (like a gun is cocked when the hammer is fully back ready to fire).

But, if you felt it was causing problems with the opposition jumpers, then there was no problem in just talking to the hooker about it. Interesting though.
 

tim White


Referees in England
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Messages
2,004
Post Likes
261
I might be tempted to comment if it caused a problem, say 'He's done it that way every time, get on with it', first time I would probably re-set and even ask for a demonstration throw if it was that unusual.

Being a suspicious character, I like to watch the teams practising pre-game, and I will comment if I see something that might cause a problem later. 'Time your jumps better lads, Better throw them straighter in the game' or the like.
 

ExHookah


Argentina Referees in Argentina
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
2,444
Post Likes
1
I agree, if it's his consistent technique then the defending jumpers should get used to it.

When I played I'd place the ball in my left hand and then rotate my arm around so the ball was above my head, meeting it with my right hand. That was the point at which I was ready, and would pause before then throwing.

Very rarely would there be any problems with this. Occasionally a defender might say something, but that was normally gamesmanship and was normally defused by a ref who would tell them that this was just my routine.
 
W

whiskey

Guest
This is an interesting one and becoming more frequent. In effect he was trying to get a free kick by making the opposition get up to early in the line. Too often there is a dummy jump and the tendency is to penalise the opposition rather than the team throwing in( who are initiating the act), management is the key as always
 

Joop


Referees in Holland
Joined
Feb 2, 2004
Messages
23
Post Likes
0
When teams go through a couple of line-outs during warm-up will give you advance information on the hookers normal routine. You'll know then whether he is trying for a free kick or just doing his normal thing.
 

Simon Thomas


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Messages
12,848
Post Likes
189
I agree Joop.

I always watch both teams practice their line out to assess hookers' throwing action and method of (safe) support of jumpers.

Comments to players plus coaches is always good to estabish an early rapport.
 

Account Deleted

Facebook Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Messages
4,089
Post Likes
1
We've been told that If a player stand with the ball pointing forward or back to begin the throw it is fine as long as the movement that follows is a single one. There is no reference in the laws to "Cocked" anyway
Law 19.6(b) (b) The throw-in at the line-out must be taken without
delay and without pretending to throw.
Penalty: Free Kick

First one go again and have a word and ping if it happens again.
 

Deeps


Referees in England
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
3,529
Post Likes
0
All The Time Ref said:
...There is no reference in the laws to "Cocked" anyway...

In your compendium of come-in-handy phrases for use on such occasions as "But sir, his arm was cocked?" should be the remark;

"There is a lot about balls in law but nothing about cocks!".
 
Top