Nice Tackle?

OB..


Referees in England
Staff member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
22,981
Post Likes
1,838
The hips are the key Simon, the approximate CofG of the human body is fractionally above the hips.

If you tackle and drive a player above the hips, you can knock them onto their back without lifting them

https://youtu.be/CsJZaYOgFhc

But if you tackle and drive below the hips, you are likely to flip them over

https://youtu.be/oGY83tyX66I?t=11

If you drive, you are moving forward forcefully. If you lift,you are usually more or less static initially.

(Grey areas as usual, of course).
 

didds

Resident Club Coach
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,075
Post Likes
1,800
... though seemingly only in the last decade has a tackle below the hips ended up with spearing... cos its the action adter the grasp that makes the difference surely?

didds
 

Marc Wakeham


Referees in Wales
Joined
Jan 5, 2018
Messages
2,779
Post Likes
842
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
What brand of whacky-baccy have you been smoking Marc?

Warburton lifted Vincent Clerc off the ground, turned him over dropped him head first from over a metre. On no planet in the known universe are those two tackles the same.


I think WR need to stop pissing about, grow some gonads, and make it a PK infringement to lift an opponent off the ground at all. Drive him off his feet, yes, lift him off his feet, no!

That is exactly the point, He lifted him off his feet with no need. At that point the same. After that yes Warbs went further but you have toask both palyers why were they lifting it was not needed. I am ONLY referring to the lift part.
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,811
Post Likes
3,149

SimonSmith


Referees in Australia
Staff member
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
9,370
Post Likes
1,471
The hips are the key Simon, the approximate CofG of the human body is fractionally above the hips.

If you tackle and drive a player above the hips, you can knock them onto their back without lifting them

https://youtu.be/CsJZaYOgFhc

But if you tackle and drive below the hips, you are likely to flip them over

https://youtu.be/oGY83tyX66I?t=11

Yes but. They are mutually exclusive - you can lift from above the hips, and you can be safe below the hips.

I'm not arguing against what you're trying to achieve. I worry about practical implementation. Working as Discipline Chair since 2012, I've seen more than one perfectly good driving tackle get red carded.

I think if we adopt your interpretation, things would get a lot worse before they got better.
 

Ian_Cook


Referees in New Zealand
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
13,680
Post Likes
1,760
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
So tackle HIGH for safety reasons :)

"In my day"[SUP]TM[/SUP], we generally grasped around the waist when tackling from front-on or side-on, and more often around the legs when tackling from behind. Of course, in those days "offload" was something that was done from the back of a truck.
 

Dickie E


Referees in Australia
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
14,139
Post Likes
2,155
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
... though seemingly only in the last decade has a tackle below the hips ended up with spearing...

in the olden days tacklers were quite happy to go to ground with the ball carrier. These days, when they can, tacklers (or, more accurately, tackle assists) will try to stay on their feet to keep themselves in the game.

When was the last time you saw a SH do a dive pass?
 

Ian_Cook


Referees in New Zealand
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
13,680
Post Likes
1,760
Current Referee grade:
Level 2
in the olden days tacklers were quite happy to go to ground with the ball carrier. These days, when they can, tacklers (or, more accurately, tackle assists) will try to stay on their feet to keep themselves in the game.

When was the last time you saw a SH do a dive pass?


Yep.

Back in the day, I would never have considered the idea of picking up a player and dumping him. I would be trying to drag him to the ground with me.
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,811
Post Likes
3,149
Mid point range 6 weeks plus they took his previous record into account and added a week

Ashton has a malicious streak in him.
 

Camquin

Rugby Expert
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
1,653
Post Likes
310
Actually low end
9.18 A player must not lift an opponent off the ground and drop or drive
that player so that their head and/or upper body make contact with the
ground.

Low-end: 6 weeks
Mid-range: 10 weeks
Top-end: 14+ weeks
Max: 52 weeks
 

Camquin

Rugby Expert
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
1,653
Post Likes
310
The latest wrinkle is that the Sale Sharks may not have a match this week.
In the hearing it was apparently stated they had a match against Sale FC.
But FC played Stoke yesterday.
If Sharks do not have a match, Ashton will miss the Perpigan match instead.
 
Top