Fair enough, are you arguing that no briefing is required at all ?
Mark
I reckon I would be happy to do away with PMB completely
Fair enough, are you arguing that no briefing is required at all ?
Mark
I reckon I would be happy to do away with PMB completely
That is probably typical of the majority of PMBs I hear, though some will talk to the whole team after studs with their own version of "Hallo, I'm the ref. Let's have a good game" Done well, with perhaps a little humour it starts to establish a relationship on the right footing.Pre match process.
Introduce myself to coach,
Quick chat about conditions [optional ice breaker]
"when would you like to do studs etc?"
Check studs
"Front row, scrum half and skipper please"
C-B-S, to FR :"If you have any safety concerns about the conditions, let me know"
To SH - "Don't go into the gap between flanker & No 8. I'll keep the flanker straight."
To Captain: " Are you going in ? [presume yes], I'll give you a knock 5mins before KO. I want you out at 3 mins before Ko"
"Any questions?" to captain only
Done. Never change it, never have any problems.
I was told early on, by a wise old ref, the more you speak, the deeper the hole you dig. Totally agree. Fallen in it many times.
Fair enough, are you arguing that no briefing is required at all ?
Mark
I tend to agree. If you don't think its helpful to set expectations about the ref then there is no reason to do it. The FR briefing is pointless, since you talk at the scrum when problems arise. There is no safety reason to say straight and stable etc.
I dont agree that front row talks are pointless , since you talk to them at scrum.?
For me the scrum if not handled correctly can be dangerous .
The pack stays safer , if they know ref is not going to let go ,,early pushing ,,look for correct binding ,,most importantly stability .
The purpose of talking before hand , is not to take up talk time during match .
Yes verbally manage at under age grades if needed .
But having a brief before match with front row is vital ,,for me .
There is an expectation from all clubs ,,to have a safe refferee at all games .
Poor can be accepted ,,but not unsafe.
I tend to agree. If you don't think its helpful to set expectations about the ref then there is no reason to do it. The FR briefing is pointless, since you talk at the scrum when problems arise. There is no safety reason to say straight and stable etc.
I dont agree that front row talks are pointless , since you talk to them at scrum.?
For me the scrum if not handled correctly can be dangerous .
The pack stays safer , if they know ref is not going to let go ,,early pushing ,,look for correct binding ,,most importantly stability .
The purpose of talking before hand , is not to take up talk time during match .
Yes verbally manage at under age grades if needed .
But having a brief before match with front row is vital ,,for me .
There is an expectation from all clubs ,,to have a safe refferee at all games .
Poor can be accepted ,,but not unsafe.
At junior level telling them to hold at 1.5m or you peep for a reset is the only PMB that is gonna help safety?
Mark
It's a Free Kick, not a reset.
I looked for evidence in law but couldn't find it this morning, do you have something that states FK?
Mark
I was referring to a legal scrum being reset once its moved beyond 1.5m at junior level
As I said, it shouldn't be reset, it should be a FK if they go beyond 1.5m
Cross ref has kindly provided the law reference.
If you can prevent the need for a FK by calling hold, and they stop as a result, all well and good.
Given it is impossible to judge 1.5m accurately as a ref, I do not expect the front row to know when they reach my guess of the distance, so I would never penalise them without calling hold - but I do expect them to stop promptly when I do call.