[Law] Marler grope

CrouchTPEngage


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
498
Post Likes
58
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
I haven't heard it yet but I am wondering if a JM's defence brief could argue that the intent of the law/sanctions was about violent conduct.
"A player must not do anything that is against the spirit of good sportsmanship including including but not limited to grabbing, twisting or squeezing the genitals" is the text I saw.
He could argue the "it was just a bit of fun between mates" line. Some people have remarked that what he did was more of a "tickling and prodding" than anything intended to cause injury or pain. "Grabbing", "Twisting" and "Squeezing" are indicative of intent to hurt.
I just wonder if he'll get any mileage in that.
 

didds

Resident Club Coach
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,072
Post Likes
1,800
Its about his only mileage.

Hed probably be better off sayiong sorry and bringing a plate of biscuits.

didds
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,811
Post Likes
3,149
I haven't heard it yet but I am wondering if a JM's defence brief could argue that the intent of the law/sanctions was about violent conduct.
"A player must not do anything that is against the spirit of good sportsmanship including including but not limited to grabbing, twisting or squeezing the genitals" is the text I saw.
He could argue the "it was just a bit of fun between mates" line. Some people have remarked that what he did was more of a "tickling and prodding" than anything intended to cause injury or pain. "Grabbing", "Twisting" and "Squeezing" are indicative of intent to hurt.
I just wonder if he'll get any mileage in that.

AWJ has already torpedoed that defence , saying he wasn't happy about it
 

CrouchTPEngage


Referees in England
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
498
Post Likes
58
Current Referee grade:
Level 8
Remember the Exeter try celebration of 2 seasons ago ? It was referred to as the 'cock tap'. As it was with players of the same team, I can only assume this was acceptable. Is that the critical difference ?
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,811
Post Likes
3,149
Remember the Exeter try celebration of 2 seasons ago ? It was referred to as the 'cock tap'. As it was with players of the same team, I can only assume this was acceptable. Is that the critical difference ?

Of course it's not acceptable...

In that environment was it possible for an individual player to easily opt out of the cock tapping ? or was there social pressure to conform? what do you guess?
 

Rich_NL

Rugby Expert
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
1,621
Post Likes
499
I don't think it's my job as referee to police the consensuality of team dynamics, and I believe I'd rapidly lose any authority or respect if I tried to.

I don't know the celebration, but provided its no more exuberant than others, and not shocking to observers, they can do what they like.
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,811
Post Likes
3,149
I don't think it's my job as referee to police the consensuality of team dynamics, and I believe I'd rapidly lose any authority or respect if I tried to.

I don't know the celebration, but provided its no more exuberant than others, and not shocking to observers, they can do what they like.

As a referee, on the field, in the game, I agree you can't get involved
 
Last edited:

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,811
Post Likes
3,149
What is it like when it happens to you
Chris Ashton

.I've had a finger poked up my bum. I don't want to name the player but I feel I should because it bothered me at the time.

"He poked me in the bum twice hard. I was thinking 'what's going through his mind there?' It was hard, violent and I reacted quite badly. It's happened to me a few times. I got it once in rugby league."

"sexual assault" would be an appropriate term for that right.



https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/i-would-reacted-lot-less-17896758
 

timmad

Avid Rugby Lover
Joined
Apr 4, 2012
Messages
208
Post Likes
55
Current Referee grade:
Level 10
Just to be a devil: if the player was grabbed by a gay player would your position change? Or a gay player was grabbed?

I can't believe that you think that something with an entry point of 12 weeks is worthy of just a chat. 12 weeks puts it on a par with biting; is biting just a chat? It's the same as deliberate contact with the eyes?


Given where WR have the seriousness pegged, don't you think you may be a little off in your calibration?

Players' sexuality is none of my - or I believe any referee's - concern.
As to the entry level stuff, I think it's more concerned with violent conduct not the misplaced joke / wind up that Marler attempted.
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,811
Post Likes
3,149
Not tolerated it, made my view clear and penalised the player.

Your post said a chat -- and then a PK. I thought you meant a PK if it happened a second time (rather unlikely)

So yes a PK is a PK. But I would say a RC is better
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,811
Post Likes
3,149
Players' sexuality is none of my - or I believe any referee's - concern.
As to the entry level stuff, I think it's more concerned with violent conduct not the misplaced joke / wind up that Marler attempted.

"misplaced joke" is the wrong way to categorise this I think. That's the 'banter' defence, which is never clever.

I have now seen on twitter two videos of Marler doing the same thing before (once at a ruck, once in the changing room). It's not a one off, it's a pattern
 

Zebra1922


Referees in Scotland
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
717
Post Likes
233
Current Referee grade:
Select Grade
Players' sexuality is none of my - or I believe any referee's - concern.
As to the entry level stuff, I think it's more concerned with violent conduct not the misplaced joke / wind up that Marler attempted.

This is not a misplaced joke - or if it is it is one that require admonishment and a severe sanction. It is not a joke to upstart someone, it is not a joke to touch a players breasts, it is not a joke to touch a players genetalia.

It's not banter, it's not a result of 'snowflakes' taking over the earth. It's unacceptable conduct and needs to be stamped out whenever it is seen.
 

didds

Resident Club Coach
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
12,072
Post Likes
1,800
should the defendant's previous be considered/known by the jury?

didds
 

crossref


Referees in England
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
21,811
Post Likes
3,149
This isn't a trial , it's a disciplinary, there is no jury
 

Not Kurt Weaver


Referees in America
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
2,285
Post Likes
159
Just to be a devil: if the player was grabbed by a gay player would your position change? Or a gay player was grabbed?

Or what if a gay player grabbed another gay player?

Or what if a gay player grabbed his gay teammate?

Or what if a gay player grabbed his partner?,teammate or opponent?b
 
Last edited:

Not Kurt Weaver


Referees in America
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
2,285
Post Likes
159
I tried and tried to heAr GT on the video. I couldn’t even understand what he said. I mean actually hear clearly what he said.
When I saw it in print, It had lost its impact.
 
Top